From: Eduard Serra <eduser25@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Eduard Serra <eserra@vmware.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/vmxnet3: synchronize vmxnet definitionswith 6.7 public
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 17:36:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ca94617.1c69fb81.5593b.1f0d@mx.google.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190407003641.YKlRFo5SXOwA5k8O-vc21m_OhD9jh67rzKYT8L1Lgks@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1760571.o9aQio58az@xps>
Hey Thomas,
Thanks for taking a look.
My intentions is to port some of the new features on top of this patch (flow steering, ESP RSS – preparing the patches right now) which we are using inhouse to DPDK, however for that I require to upgrade definitions.
The ownership of this definitions is VMware’s ESX team, my main goal was to keep the definitions identical to most recent ESX’s, for correctness and ease of maintenance later on, instead of just adding bits and pieces.
Does that sound good or should I follow a different approach?
Thanks for the help,
Edu
PS. I mistakenly pushed this with private email address, I’ll change to vmware’s domain one next iteration.
From: Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 2:26 PM
To: Eduard Serra
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; eduser25@gmail.com; yongwang@vmware.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/vmxnet3: synchronize vmxnet definitionswith 6.7 public
Hi,
> From: Eduard Serra <eserra@vmware.com>
>
> Synchronize new definitions made public defs on ESX 6.7, which
> include support for variety of new features and fixes on vmxnet3
> driver.
Please, would it be possible to split this patch,
and add explanations in each patch for each feature or cleanup?
Thank you
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-07 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 20:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/vmxnet3: synchronize vmxnet definitions with " eduser25
2019-04-04 20:54 ` eduser25
2019-04-04 21:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 21:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-07 0:36 ` Eduard Serra [this message]
2019-04-07 0:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/vmxnet3: synchronize vmxnet definitionswith " Eduard Serra
2019-04-07 9:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-07 9:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ca94617.1c69fb81.5593b.1f0d@mx.google.com \
--to=eduser25@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=eserra@vmware.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).