DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, aconole@redhat.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] acl: remove use of weak functions
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:45:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410134517.63896-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410134517.63896-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Weak functions don't work well with static libraries and require the use of
"whole-archive" flag to ensure that the correct function is used when
linking. Since the weak functions are only used as placeholders within
this library alone, we can replace them with non-weak functions using
preprocessor ifdefs.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_acl/meson.build |  7 ++++++-
 lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c   | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 mk/rte.app.mk              |  3 ---
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/meson.build b/lib/librte_acl/meson.build
index 2207dbafe..98ece7d85 100644
--- a/lib/librte_acl/meson.build
+++ b/lib/librte_acl/meson.build
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ sources = files('acl_bld.c', 'acl_gen.c', 'acl_run_scalar.c',
 		'rte_acl.c', 'tb_mem.c')
 headers = files('rte_acl.h', 'rte_acl_osdep.h')
 
-if arch_subdir == 'x86'
+if dpdk_conf.has('RTE_ARCH_X86')
 	sources += files('acl_run_sse.c')
 
 	# compile AVX2 version if either:
@@ -28,4 +28,9 @@ if arch_subdir == 'x86'
 		cflags += '-DCC_AVX2_SUPPORT'
 	endif
 
+elif dpdk_conf.has('RTE_ARCH_ARM') or dpdk_conf.has('RTE_ARCH_ARM64')
+	cflags += '-flax-vector-conversions'
+	sources += files('acl_run_neon.c')
+elif dpdk_conf.has('RTE_ARCH_PPC_64')
+	sources += files('acl_run_altivec.c')
 endif
diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c b/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c
index c436a9bfd..fd5bd5e4e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c
+++ b/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ static struct rte_tailq_elem rte_acl_tailq = {
 };
 EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(rte_acl_tailq)
 
+#ifndef RTE_ARCH_X86
+#ifndef CC_AVX2_SUPPORT
 /*
  * If the compiler doesn't support AVX2 instructions,
  * then the dummy one would be used instead for AVX2 classify method.
  */
-__rte_weak int
+int
 rte_acl_classify_avx2(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 	__rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
 	__rte_unused uint32_t *results,
@@ -26,8 +28,9 @@ rte_acl_classify_avx2(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 {
 	return -ENOTSUP;
 }
+#endif
 
-__rte_weak int
+int
 rte_acl_classify_sse(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 	__rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
 	__rte_unused uint32_t *results,
@@ -36,8 +39,11 @@ rte_acl_classify_sse(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 {
 	return -ENOTSUP;
 }
+#endif
 
-__rte_weak int
+#ifndef RTE_ARCH_ARM
+#ifndef RTE_ARCH_ARM64
+int
 rte_acl_classify_neon(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 	__rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
 	__rte_unused uint32_t *results,
@@ -46,8 +52,11 @@ rte_acl_classify_neon(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 {
 	return -ENOTSUP;
 }
+#endif
+#endif
 
-__rte_weak int
+#ifndef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
+int
 rte_acl_classify_altivec(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 	__rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
 	__rte_unused uint32_t *results,
@@ -56,6 +65,7 @@ rte_acl_classify_altivec(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
 {
 	return -ENOTSUP;
 }
+#endif
 
 static const rte_acl_classify_t classify_fns[] = {
 	[RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_DEFAULT] = rte_acl_classify_scalar,
diff --git a/mk/rte.app.mk b/mk/rte.app.mk
index 7d994bece..fdec636b4 100644
--- a/mk/rte.app.mk
+++ b/mk/rte.app.mk
@@ -46,10 +46,7 @@ _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DISTRIBUTOR)    += -lrte_distributor
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG)        += -lrte_ip_frag
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_METER)          += -lrte_meter
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_LPM)            += -lrte_lpm
-# librte_acl needs --whole-archive because of weak functions
-_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL)            += --whole-archive
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL)            += -lrte_acl
-_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL)            += --no-whole-archive
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_TELEMETRY)      += --no-as-needed
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_TELEMETRY)      += --whole-archive
 _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_TELEMETRY)      += -lrte_telemetry -ljansson
-- 
2.20.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-10 13:45 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] remove use of weak functions from libraries Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:45 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-04-10 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] acl: remove use of weak functions Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:54   ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 13:54     ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:02     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 14:02       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 14:08       ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:08         ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:57   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 14:57     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] bpf: " Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 14:07   ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:07     ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:27     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 14:27       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 14:57   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 14:57     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-27 14:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] remove use of weak functions from libraries David Marchand
2019-05-27 15:41   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-05-27 20:57     ` Aaron Conole
2019-05-28  8:06       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-06-05 14:41 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190410134517.63896-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).