From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F83AA00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:57:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6883E1B4F3;
	Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:57:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212591B4E1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:57:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D38C81F01;
 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:57:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.36.117.214] (ovpn-117-214.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.214])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693095D707;
 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:57:38 +0000 (UTC)
To: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
 chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
 hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com
References: <1544672265-219262-2-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
 <1553505299-34459-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <8aca69cf-8bec-3546-1f8a-1913e3ca694f@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:57:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1553505299-34459-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:57:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] rwlock: reimplement rwlock with
 atomic and add relevant perf test case
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190416145737.PmHsHwNzLnOmAc5ULYWYq_-bcMC8qSilnJb-ixBviTc@z>

On 25/03/2019 09:14, Joyce Kong wrote:
> Gavin Hu (1):
>   rwlock: reimplement with atomic builtins
> 

Hi - for 18.11 branch, I applied above (queued for push) rebased to
remove the trylock modifications.

> Joyce Kong (2):
>   test/rwlock: add perf test case on all available cores
>   test/rwlock: amortize the cost of getting time

The function that calls these new functions is not in 18.11. Please send
a backport for 18.11 branch, or let me know that it's not needed in 18.11.

thanks,
Kevin.