DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "paulmck@linux.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
	Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>,
	Malvika Gupta <Malvika.Gupta@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:39:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A98F26@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190417133908.BxQ3KUYgoiWN5tmdP4n4wj6nxHCRg3ZobTxZ3WRWFvI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB514983BE886E05A7CAB277D298250@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>


> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > After evaluating long term API/ABI issues, I think
> > > > > > > > > > > > you need to get rid of almost all use of inline and
> > > > > > > > > > > > visible structures. Yes it might be marginally
> > > > > > > > > > > > slower, but you thank me
> > > > > > the first time you have to fix something.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Agree, I was planning on another version to address
> > > > > > > > > > > this (I am yet
> > > > > > to take a look at your patch addressing the ABI).
> > > > > > > > > > > The structure visibility definitely needs to be addressed.
> > > > > > > > > > > For the inline functions, is the plan to convert all
> > > > > > > > > > > the inline functions in DPDK? If yes, I think we need
> > > > > > > > > > > to consider the performance
> > > > > > > > > > difference. May be consider L3-fwd application, change
> > > > > > > > > > all the
> > > > > > inline functions in its path and run a test?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Every function that is not in the direct datapath should
> > > > > > > > > > not be
> > > > > > inline.
> > > > > > > > > > Exceptions or things like rx/tx burst, ring
> > > > > > > > > > enqueue/dequeue, and packet alloc/free
> > > > > I do not understand how DPDK can claim ABI compatibility if we
> > > > > have
> > > > inline functions (unless we freeze any development in these inline
> > > > functions forever).
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Plus synchronization routines: spin/rwlock/barrier, etc.
> > > > > > > > > I think rcu should be one of such exceptions - it is just
> > > > > > > > > another synchronization mechanism after all (just a bit
> > > > > > > > > more
> > > > sophisticated).
> > > > > > > > > Konstantin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you look at the other userspace RCU, you wil see that the
> > > > > > > > only inlines are the rcu_read_lock,rcu_read_unlock and
> > > > > > rcu_reference/rcu_assign_pointer.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The synchronization logic is all real functions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In fact, I think urcu provides both flavors:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/urcu/userspace-
> > > > > > rcu/blob/master/include/urcu/static/
> > > > > > > urcu-qsbr.h I still don't understand why we have to treat it
> > > > > > > differently then let say spin-lock/ticket-lock or rwlock.
> > > > > > > If we gone all the way to create our own version of rcu, we
> > > > > > > probably want it to be as fast as possible (I know that main
> > > > > > > speedup should come from the fact that readers don't have to
> > > > > > > wait for writer to finish, but still...)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Konstantin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Having locking functions inline is already a problem in current
> > releases.
> > > > > > The implementation can not be improved without breaking ABI (or
> > > > > > doing special workarounds like lock v2)
> > > > > I think ABI and inline function discussion needs to be taken up in
> > > > > a
> > > > different thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, I am looking to hide the structure visibility. I looked
> > > > > at your
> > > > patch [1], it is a different case than what I have in this patch. It
> > > > is a pretty generic use case as well (similar situation exists in
> > > > other libraries). I think a generic solution should be agreed upon.
> > > > >
> > > > > If we have to hide the structure content, the handle to QS
> > > > > variable
> > > > returned to the application needs to be opaque. I suggest using 'void *'
> > > > behind which any structure can be used.
> > > > >
> > > > > typedef void * rte_rcu_qsbr_t;
> > > > > typedef void * rte_hash_t;
> > > > >
> > > > > But it requires typecasting.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://patchwork.dpdk.org/cover/52609/
> > > >
> > > > C allows structure to be defined without knowing what is in it
> > therefore.
> > > >
> > > > typedef struct rte_rcu_qsbr rte_rcu_qsbr_t;
> > > >
> > > > is preferred (or do it without typedef)
> > > >
> > > > struct rte_rcu_qsbr;
> > >
> > > I see that rte_hash library uses the same approach (struct rte_hash in
> > rte_hash.h, though it is marking as internal). But the ABI Laboratory tool
> > [1] seems to be reporting incorrect numbers for this library even though
> > the internal structure is changed.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://abi-
> > laboratory.pro/index.php?view=compat_report&l=dpdk&v1=19.0
> > > 2&v2=current&obj=66794&kind=abi
> >
> > The problem is rte_hash structure is exposed as part of ABI in
> > rte_cuckoo_hash.h This was a mistake.
> Do you mean, due to the use of structure with the same name? I am wondering if it is just a tools issue. The application is not supposed to
> include rte_cuckoo_hash.h.
> 
> For the RCU library, we either need to go all functions or leave it the way it is. I do not see a point in trying to hide the internal structure
> while having inline functions.
> 
> I converted the inline functions to function calls.
> 
> Testing on Arm platform (results *are* repeatable) shows very minimal drop (0.1% to 0.2%) in performance while using lock-free rte_hash
> data structure. But one of the test cases which is just spinning shows good amount of drop (41%).
> 
> Testing on x86 (Xeon Gold 6132 CPU @ 2.60GHz, results *are* pretty repeatable) shows performance improvements (7% to 8%) while using
> lock-free rte_hash data structure. The test cases which is just spinning show significant drop (14%, 155%, 231%).
> Konstantin, any thoughts on the results?

The fact that function show better result than inline (even for hash) is sort of surprise to me.
Don't have any good explanation off-hand, but the actual numbers for hash test are huge by itself...

In general, I still think that sync primitives better to stay inlined - there is no much point to create ones
and then figure out that no-one using them because they are too slow.
Though if there is no real perf difference between inlined and normal - no point to keep it inlined.
About RCU lib, my thought to have inlined version for 19.05 and do further perf testing with it
(as I remember there were suggestions about using it in l3fwd for guarding routing table or so).
If we'll find there is no real difference - move it to not-inlined version in 19.08.
It is experimental for now  - so could be changed without formal ABI breakage.

 Konstantin




  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 260+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-22  3:30 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/3] tqs: add thread quiescent state library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-22  3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/3] log: add TQS log type Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-27 22:24   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-28  5:58     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-22  3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/3] tqs: add thread quiescent state library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-24 12:18   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-11-27 21:32     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-28 15:25       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-12-07  7:27         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-07 17:29           ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-11  6:40             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-13 12:26               ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-18  4:30                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-18  6:31                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-12  9:29           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-12-13  7:39             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-17 13:14               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-11-22  3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/3] test/tqs: Add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
     [not found] ` <CGME20181122073110eucas1p17592400af6c0b807dc87e90d136575af@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-11-22  7:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/3] tqs: add thread quiescent state library Ilya Maximets
2018-11-27 22:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-27 22:49   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-11-28  5:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-28 23:23       ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-30  2:13         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-30 16:26           ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-30 18:32             ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-30 20:20             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-30 20:56           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-30 23:44             ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-01 18:37               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-30  2:25     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-30 21:03       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-12-22  2:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/2] rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-22  2:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 1/2] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-15 11:39     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-15 20:43       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-16 15:56         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-18  6:48           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-18 12:14             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-24 17:15               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-24 18:05                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-02-22  7:07                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-22  2:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-23  7:30     ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-23 16:25       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-18  7:04         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-22  7:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3 0/5] rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-22  7:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3 1/5] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-22  7:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3 2/5] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-22  7:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3 3/5] lib/rcu: add dynamic memory allocation capability Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-22  7:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3 4/5] test/rcu_qsbr: modify test cases for dynamic memory allocation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-22  7:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3 5/5] lib/rcu: fix the size of register thread ID array size Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-22 16:42     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-22 16:42       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-26  4:35       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-26  4:35         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 11:15         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-28 11:15           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-29  5:54           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29  5:54             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-19  4:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-25 11:34     ` Kovacevic, Marko
2019-03-25 11:34       ` Kovacevic, Marko
2019-03-26  4:43       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-26  4:43         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-27  5:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:10   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:11     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 10:22     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-02 10:22       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-02 10:53       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-02 10:53         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-01 17:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:11     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 10:55     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-02 10:55       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-01 17:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:11     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 18:14     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-10 18:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-11  4:35       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-11  4:35         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-11 15:26         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-11 15:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-12 20:21           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:21             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-15 16:51             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 16:51               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 19:46               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-15 19:46                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 15:26     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 15:26       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 16:15       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 16:15         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 11:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 22:06     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 22:06       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 22:24       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 22:24         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 23:06         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 23:06           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-15 12:24           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 12:24             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 15:38             ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-15 15:38               ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-15 17:39               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 17:39                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 18:56                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-15 18:56                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-15 21:26                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-15 21:26                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16  5:29                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-16  5:29                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-16 14:54                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 14:54                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 16:56                       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-16 16:56                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-16 21:22                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 21:22                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-17  1:45                           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  1:45                             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17 13:39                             ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-04-17 13:39                               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-17 14:02                               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17 14:02                                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17 14:18                               ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-17 14:18                                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-12 20:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-12 20:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-15 17:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 17:29     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-16  5:10     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-16  5:10       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-19 19:19     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-19 19:19       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-23  1:08       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  1:08         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-17  4:13     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-21 16:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-21 16:40     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-25 14:18     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-25 14:18       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-25 14:27       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-25 14:27         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-25 14:38       ` David Marchand
2019-04-25 14:38         ` David Marchand
2019-04-23  4:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  4:31   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  4:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  4:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  8:10     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-23  8:10       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-23 21:23       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23 21:23         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-24 20:02         ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-24 20:02           ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-25  5:15           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-25  5:15             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-24 10:03     ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-24 10:03       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-23  4:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  4:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  4:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-23  4:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-24 10:12     ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-24 10:12       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-26  4:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:39   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:39     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  8:13     ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-26  8:13       ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-28  3:25     ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-28  3:25       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-29 20:33       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-29 20:33         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-30 10:51         ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-04-30 10:51           ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-04-26  4:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:39     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-29 20:35     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-29 20:35       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-30  4:20       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-30  4:20         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-30  7:58         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-30  7:58           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-26  4:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:39     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] doc: added RCU to the release notes Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26  4:40     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-26 12:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-26 12:04     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-01  3:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-03 14:31     ` David Marchand
2019-05-03 14:31       ` David Marchand
2019-05-06 23:16       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-06 23:16         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] doc/rcu: add lib_rcu documentation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 11:37     ` Mcnamara, John
2019-05-01 11:37       ` Mcnamara, John
2019-05-01 21:20       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 21:20         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 21:32         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-01 21:32           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-01  3:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] doc: added RCU to the release notes Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01  3:54     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 11:31     ` Mcnamara, John
2019-05-01 11:31       ` Mcnamara, John
2019-05-01 12:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] lib/rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism Neil Horman
2019-05-01 12:15     ` Neil Horman
2019-05-01 14:56     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 14:56       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 18:05       ` Neil Horman
2019-05-01 18:05         ` Neil Horman
2019-05-01 21:18         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 21:18           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-01 23:36   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-01 23:36     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A98F26@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Malvika.Gupta@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).