DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: avoid explicit check of valid port state
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:59:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417225928.8962-1-thomas@monjalon.net> (raw)

Some port iterations are manually checking against RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED
instead of using the iterators based on rte_eth_find_next().

A new macro RTE_ETH_FOREACH_VALID_DEV() is introduced, but kept private
because there should be no need of iterating over all devices in the API.
The public iterators have additional filters for ownership, parent device
or sibling ports.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c        |  9 ++-------
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
index 9ff50dfbe..4deaada5c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
@@ -1964,14 +1964,9 @@ static int
 mlx5_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
 {
 	uint16_t port_id;
-	struct rte_eth_dev *port;
 
-	for (port_id = 0; port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; port_id++) {
-		port = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
-		if (port->state != RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED &&
-				port->device == &pci_dev->device)
-			rte_eth_dev_close(port_id);
-	}
+	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV_OF(port_id, &pci_dev->device)
+		rte_eth_dev_close(port_id);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index 243beb4dd..cca15efca 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -339,6 +339,11 @@ rte_eth_find_next(uint16_t port_id)
 	return port_id;
 }
 
+#define RTE_ETH_FOREACH_VALID_DEV(port_id) \
+	for (port_id = rte_eth_find_next(0); \
+	     port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; \
+	     port_id = rte_eth_find_next(port_id + 1))
+
 uint16_t
 rte_eth_find_next_of(uint16_t port_id, const struct rte_device *parent)
 {
@@ -584,13 +589,10 @@ rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(uint64_t owner_id)
 uint64_t
 rte_eth_find_next_owned_by(uint16_t port_id, const uint64_t owner_id)
 {
+	port_id = rte_eth_find_next(port_id);
 	while (port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS &&
-	       (rte_eth_devices[port_id].state == RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED ||
-	       rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner.id != owner_id))
-		port_id++;
-
-	if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS)
-		return RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS;
+			rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner.id != owner_id)
+		port_id = rte_eth_find_next(port_id + 1);
 
 	return port_id;
 }
@@ -768,9 +770,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_count_total(void)
 {
 	uint16_t port, count = 0;
 
-	for (port = 0; port < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; port++)
-		if (rte_eth_devices[port].state != RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED)
-			count++;
+	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_VALID_DEV(port)
+		count++;
 
 	return count;
 }
@@ -804,13 +805,11 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(const char *name, uint16_t *port_id)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	for (pid = 0; pid < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; pid++) {
-		if (rte_eth_devices[pid].state != RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED &&
-		    !strcmp(name, rte_eth_dev_shared_data->data[pid].name)) {
+	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_VALID_DEV(pid)
+		if (!strcmp(name, rte_eth_dev_shared_data->data[pid].name)) {
 			*port_id = pid;
 			return 0;
 		}
-	}
 
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
-- 
2.21.0

             reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 22:59 Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-04-17 22:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-17 22:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: promote function for port count as stable Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-17 22:59   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 11:51   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 11:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 12:34     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-18 12:34       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-18 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: avoid explicit check of valid port state Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 11:50   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 12:47   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 12:47     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 17:38     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 17:38       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 18:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 18:37   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190417225928.8962-1-thomas@monjalon.net \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).