From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BC1A00E6 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6D51BC9B; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E1A1BC99 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DBB25D44; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=Nudi72VIPqB7TD3yKwRtBsWvRFeFvaBteDSfZu1PKc4=; b=MoTJ7nmJuBJD Q3kYW5DePptwXTRYU5tSopO+UkX2SOL2Hgev28p/3bztp9knt4o0lKyZ0r7xR5LB kvrvptceUSC/j3NPr2F+ah36/qhzijJYIVI+2bxtpIFOHlIVUGeLPjGcghS/2lQH c7dYQM9oTOe0pcUxz0cwdCHTEH5I0Vg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Nudi72VIPqB7TD3yKwRtBsWvRFeFvaBteDSfZu1PK c4=; b=1JhBUbZjCDZzODGjzajMVwX4JevXLDAHsl1RKvosb1X9aWtlN8fwSAg3o hcVii/4LkGrEANqMsOhVKpPnLbU8g5jvCuPgwKxd4YRczHUU6P2+RftGNdBtBKTw Roh7bbLl5+Yb8/3HQ06TTffQ+f6kRSf7TrW657wrHxZktnDQVB3AWMeTZQli3hNQ QauH9S8RbtC3UZo2QgvHe89PindDZJAuml7mc/Rp8Bu1cUmQ1iUwCZrgU8LaTUj5 koqZVEpMSwYNExUPtpA89UJv7GfVjzrIYxhxYg1yWK8i0CumIG1ENiuSwR4R5gMN w3pSPji5NZx5FxKMur+cPcW5Qradw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfeehgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 64162103D1; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Pradeep Satyanarayana Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Christensen , Vivian Kong , David Wilder , Cindy Lee Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:30 +0200 Message-ID: <777837970.rIl5XSfYO4@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190409190630.31975-1-vivkong@ca.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190418211830.Z-2NdrHODGlWCUjzjT4J7UCc9bBPyR6hpwtY_ClkIhE@z> 18/04/2019 23:06, Pradeep Satyanarayana: > > Pradeep Satyanarayana/Beaverton/IBM wrote on 04/11/2019 08:57:05 AM: > > > From: Pradeep Satyanarayana/Beaverton/IBM > > To: Thomas Monjalon > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Christensen , Vivian > > Kong , David Wilder > > Date: 04/11/2019 08:57 AM > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture > > > > > > > > > We are still seeing some compilation issues regularly on Power. > > > > > Before going to DTS, I think you should extend your compilation > testing, > > > > > and basic feature testing with builtin unit tests. > > > > > > > > We have not observed any compilation issues since we started the CI. > The > > > > last issue reported > > > > was during 18.11-rc1 that Mellanox fixed. Hopefully, we should catch > any > > > > such regressions > > > > quickly in the future, since we now have a CI that runs periodically. > > > > > > There are some failure when compiling with big endian toolchain. > > > It seems you are not testing big endian. > > > > Correct, we have been doing all our work on little endian only. > > > > > If you don't support big endian, please mention it in the doc. > > > > Thank you for alerting us about this. Good point that you bring up. > > I will need some time to consult and figure out how we approach this. > > Let me get back to you on this. > > On the Linux on Power front going forward, there are currently no plans to > support BE, > just LE. > > The doc you mention above, is that this one? > > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/platform/index.html Yes, thank you.