From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id D720DA0096 for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:31:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D164C74; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:31:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D16849E0 for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:31:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA38F2104A; Thu, 9 May 2019 18:31:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 May 2019 18:31:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=+PHXhVeRMAjcmbBMGjmsAilUaNdJ92XM0ao5lcAjFM4=; b=PDodEa3ZDImK KMT6ZRJcwDwIeUfyfEydwT/OUbdlB88Exy1EiO/WbwZIhoHhjtza5xh+ldmWu7gA v3WpKbqc/Qtm5BU1Jb7rEGJ4PM+AtvAr8/Eb/IyYDGNyZFMUL7rbeDABknhibpV9 djLV3eMzUjLdBdNBSXdbmKIcp71Q18E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+PHXhVeRMAjcmbBMGjmsAilUaNdJ92XM0ao5lcAjF M4=; b=QUD2+BpMUUbDLonr9nyQWX346LrChpUFkMaJIuN0f9oyd38Lkq8ytapjE U+HmLdgkbCjdAB4IN5SiXvDdQh/jkSBhGJoLMdm50PKKQd3M23SBf51DmyaiYUip IMiEMigOKHkvVv5kyLeis71yYl+YR+rxNNjk6waB7zwdRNA7aAI/EHlXBddYEnvW 8HZgSFW4o8UvL3rgp4kQvg+8vQnpLW2ai2l8UFiqz0Wf8wECh8KAyZQ/cZcfZfp2 GypVfo2/QsO2uIohrTYNmmhdXUvwYQxFaKo7wLnwI9TPVU09v2b9kz6YQDBeLZEY qw83nJYprPwTs8krao66elkubqmcg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeeigdduudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E0CCB80063; Thu, 9 May 2019 18:31:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vipin Varghese Cc: dev@dpdk.org, marko.kovacevic@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com, sanjay.padubidri@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 00:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <67739198.mN8PHIGBQv@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190507084112.35296-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> References: <20190507084112.35296-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc/testpmd: update compile steps for bpf examples X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190509223142.4F7zEttk2P_DEZAizhbnJSTt_1Ta4QmMtsH23DtE_y0@z> 07/05/2019 10:41, Vipin Varghese: > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > @@ -4657,6 +4657,10 @@ To load (not JITed) t1.o at TX queue 0, port 0:: > > testpmd> bpf-load tx 0 0 - ./dpdk.org/examples/bpf/t1.o > > +.. note:: > + > + In order to build t2.c and t3.c; pass DPDK target's include and library path as compiler options. This note should be below the compilation command. When adding more BPF examples, it will be easily outdated. We could say "to build other examples, more arguments may be required". About the compiler options, I suggest to name them: -I, -L?