From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"gavin.hu@arm.com" <gavin.hu@arm.com>,
"Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com" <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>,
"nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: announce ring API change
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:58:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510075855.2899716e@hermes.lan> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190510145855.lRR_cPqbiFVM8Q-DPmx8PKnuIVCE-0axs-a5BeFUIo4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E68CB470E@fmsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 10 May 2019 14:53:56 +0000
"Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com> wrote:
> > 01/02/2019 15:36, Gage Eads:
> > > In order to support the non-blocking ring[1], an API change
> > > (additional argument to rte_ring_get_memsize()) is required in
> > > librte_ring. This commit updates the deprecation notice to pave the
> > > way for its inclusion in 19.08.
> > >
> > > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/124162.html
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
> >
> > There is still no agreement on this change?
> >
>
> Still none. I was hoping this discussion (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-April/129229.html) would lead to some clear direction, but at this point the effort is stalled.
The fundamental tradeoff is between non-blocking rings and ABI breakage.
Why not have a new ring type for non-blocking rings since non-blocking
rings are not necessary for all use cases.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-15 23:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ring ABI and API changes Gage Eads
2019-01-16 0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-16 18:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-18 15:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ring API change Gage Eads
2019-01-18 15:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Gage Eads
2019-02-01 11:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-01 14:18 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-01 14:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Gage Eads
2019-05-09 23:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-09 23:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-10 14:53 ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-10 14:53 ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-10 14:58 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-05-10 14:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-10 15:19 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-05-10 15:19 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-05-10 16:28 ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-10 16:28 ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-13 11:46 ` Olivier Matz
2019-05-13 11:46 ` Olivier Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190510075855.2899716e@hermes.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).