From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, jfreimann@redhat.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 17:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190517150613.13310-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> (raw)
Some OVS-DPDK PVP benchmarks show a performance drop
when switching from DPDK v17.11 to v18.11.
With the addition of packed ring layout support,
rte_vhost_enqueue_burst and rte_vhost_dequeue_burst
became very large, and only a part of the instructions
are executed (either packed or split ring used).
This series aims at improving the I-cache pressure,
first by un-inlining split and packed rings, but
also by moving parts considered as cold in dedicated
functions (dirty page logging, fragmented descriptors
buffer management added for CVE-2018-1059).
With the series applied, size of the enqueue and
dequeue split paths is reduced significantly:
+---------+--------------------+---------------------+
| Version | Enqueue split path | Dequeue split path |
+---------+--------------------+---------------------+
| v19.05 | 16461B | 25521B |
| +series | 7286B | 11285B |
+---------+--------------------+---------------------+
Using perf tool to monitor iTLB-load-misses event
while doing PVP benchmark with testpmd as vswitch,
we can see the number of iTLB misses being reduced:
- v19.05:
# perf stat --repeat 10 -C 2,3 -e iTLB-load-miss -- sleep 10
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2,3' (10 runs):
2,438 iTLB-load-miss ( +- 13.43% )
10.00058928 +- 0.00000336 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.00% )
- +series:
# perf stat --repeat 10 -C 2,3 -e iTLB-load-miss -- sleep 10
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2,3' (10 runs):
55 iTLB-load-miss ( +- 10.08% )
10.00059466 +- 0.00000283 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.00% )
The series also force the inlining of some rte_memcpy
helpers, as by adding packed ring support, some of them
were not more inlined but embedded as functions in
the virtio_net object file, which was not expected.
Finally, the series simplifies the descriptors buffers
prefetching, by doing it in the recently introduced
descriptor buffer mapping function.
v2:
===
- Fix checkpatch issue
- Reset author for patch 5 (David)
- Force non-inlining in patch 2 (David)
- Fix typo in path 3 commit message (David)
Maxime Coquelin (5):
vhost: un-inline dirty pages logging functions
vhost: do not inline packed and split functions
vhost: do not inline unlikely fragmented buffers code
vhost: simplify descriptor's buffer prefetching
eal/x86: force inlining of all memcpy and mov helpers
.../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h | 18 +-
lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++
lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h | 164 ++---------------
lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 143 +++++++--------
4 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 239 deletions(-)
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-17 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 15:06 Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2019-05-17 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] vhost: un-inline dirty pages logging functions Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-20 5:18 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-05-17 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] vhost: do not inline packed and split functions Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-20 5:30 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-05-17 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] vhost: do not inline unlikely fragmented buffers code Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-20 5:51 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-05-24 13:50 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] vhost: simplify descriptor's buffer prefetching Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-29 8:05 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-05-17 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] eal/x86: force inlining of all memcpy and mov helpers Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-20 8:30 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190517150613.13310-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).