From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Karlsson Magnus <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
Topel Bjorn <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
yuan.peng@intel.com, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/af_xdp: support need wakeup feature
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:05:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617100552.GC527@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xtgn_ftXK=J+W2ikMNnvuwnErzc9EDk80VQnE--cn5mQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:52AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:45 AM Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On 06/17, David Marchand wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:42 AM Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> This patch adds a new devarg to support the need_wakeup flag for Tx and
> > >> fill rings, when this flag is set by the driver, it means that the
> > >> userspace application has to explicitly wake up the kernel Rx or kernel
> > Tx
> > >> processing by issuing a syscall. Poll() can wake up both and sendto() or
> > >> its alternatives will wake up Tx processing only.
> > >>
> > >> This feature is to provide efficient support for case that application
> > and
> > >> driver are executing on the same core.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> Original busy poll feature has morphed into need_wakeup flag in
> > >> kernel side, the main purpose is the same, that is to support both
> > >> application and driver executing on the same core efficiently.
> > >>
> > >> kernel side patchset can be found at netdev mailing list.
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAJ8uoz2szX=+JXXAMyuVmvSsMXZuDqp6a8rjDQpTioxbZwxFmQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> > >>
> > >> It is targeted for v5.3
> > >>
> > >
> > >- Is this really optional? Adding too many options is just a nightmare
> > >later...
> >
> > Hmm, I think we can remove this option and alway turn the need_wakeup flag
> > on
> > since it provides better performance for 1 core case and doesn't downgrage
> > the
> > 2 core case performance.
> >
> > >
> > >- I suppose this will break compilation with kernels that have af_xdp but
> > >are < 5.3.
> >
> > Yes, that is true. It will break the compilation with early kernel, I feel
> > it's
> > sort of common issue, we enable some features in dpdk that's based on
> > kernel
> > features, then kernel side features keep evolving, we need to keep the
> > pace,
> > but it will hurt the compatiblity with the old kernel.
> >
> > What's dpdk's convention for handling this kind of case? Add some notes in
> > doc
> > to reminder the prerequisite or use the KERNEL_VERSION macro in code?
> >
>
> Rather than a kernel version, you can check that XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP is
> defined (present in the uapi kernel header).
>
+1 for this.
Also, since AF_XDP is still fairly new with ongoing development on the
kernel side, I think it is reasonable to limit out PMD to only working with
sufficiently updated kernels. Hopefully in 6 months or so, the feature set
we need should be locked down and we can specify a fixed baseline
requirement.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 14:23 Xiaolong Ye
2019-06-17 8:03 ` David Marchand
2019-06-17 15:27 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-06-17 8:51 ` David Marchand
2019-06-17 10:05 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-06-17 15:39 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-06-18 8:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xiaolong Ye
2019-06-21 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Xiaolong Ye
2019-06-27 18:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-28 8:35 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-06-28 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Xiaolong Ye
2019-06-28 17:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190617100552.GC527@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).