From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: techboard@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] minutes of techboard meeting 2019-05-15
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:18:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626101829.GA862@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Attendees:
- Bruce Richardson
- Ferruh Yigit
- Jerin Jacob
- Konstantin Ananyev
- Maxime Conquelin
- Olivier Matz
- Stephen Hemminger
- Thomas Monjalon
Meeting Minutes 2019-05-15
---------------------------
Item #1: DPDK Developer Survey
- Discussion deferred till next meeting
Item #2: SW bbdev Driver in DPDK
- Brief problem description:
- turbo_sw PMD has a dependency on FlexRAN SW libraries, which
cannot be downloaded without an SLA
- FlexRAN libraries also have a dependency on ICC, while
similarly cannot be downloaded and installed without an SLA
- Thomas has been asking for a solution since End 2018, with
little progress, so issue being brought to technical board
- Agreement that the issue here is with the turbo_sw PMD specifically
rather than bbdev framework
- Discussion followed on what is acceptable or not for drivers in
DPDK and their dependencies. Some points of consensus, some open
issues.
- Agreement that all DPDK PMDs themselves must be possible to
compile with a DPDK supported compiler - GCC and/or clang
- All PMDs must be possible for maintainers to compile, in order
to maintain those PMDs
- this implies that all dependencies of the PMDs are easily
available for maintainers to download.
- General consensus seems to be that so long as a dependency is
freely available, binary rather than source is ok
- there is already a precedent for this with existing PMDs
- Consensus that the issue with turbo_sw PMD needs to be resolved in
this release, proposed target is rc1
- Idea of having a staging area for drivers was proposed, idea was
not generally liked.
- Issue will be worked by tech board along with PMD maintainers to see
what resolution can be reached quickly.
Item #3: ABI Policy
- Issue deferred due to lack of time
- Issue to be Item #1 on next week's agenda
Item #4: Security Policy
- The mailing list "security-prerelease@dpdk.org" has been created
- Member companies must apply to join this list to be informed in
advance of security issues
- requests to join are to be sent to techboard@dpdk.org
- the technical board must then approve those requests
- companies can have more than one address registered, but
should keep number very small
Item #5: Removal of examples
- Follow on from last week - to be discussed publically on mailing
list rather than just in technical board
Next Meeting: 22nd May 2019. To be chaired by Ferruh Yigit.
reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626101829.GA862@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).