DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: techboard@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] minutes of techboard meeting 2019-05-15
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:18:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626101829.GA862@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Attendees:
- Bruce Richardson
- Ferruh Yigit
- Jerin Jacob
- Konstantin Ananyev
- Maxime Conquelin
- Olivier Matz
- Stephen Hemminger
- Thomas Monjalon

Meeting Minutes 2019-05-15
---------------------------

Item #1: DPDK Developer Survey 
      - Discussion deferred till next meeting

Item #2: SW bbdev Driver in DPDK
      - Brief problem description:
            - turbo_sw PMD has a dependency on FlexRAN SW libraries, which
              cannot be downloaded without an SLA
            - FlexRAN libraries also have a dependency on ICC, while
              similarly cannot be downloaded and installed without an SLA
            - Thomas has been asking for a solution since End 2018, with
              little progress, so issue being brought to technical board

      - Agreement that the issue here is with the turbo_sw PMD specifically
        rather than bbdev framework

      - Discussion followed on what is acceptable or not for drivers in
        DPDK and their dependencies. Some points of consensus, some open
        issues.

            - Agreement that all DPDK PMDs themselves must be possible to
              compile with a DPDK supported compiler - GCC and/or clang
            - All PMDs must be possible for maintainers to compile, in order
              to maintain those PMDs
                  - this implies that all dependencies of the PMDs are easily
                    available for maintainers to download.
            - General consensus seems to be that so long as a dependency is
              freely available, binary rather than source is ok
                  - there is already a precedent for this with existing PMDs

      - Consensus that the issue with turbo_sw PMD needs to be resolved in
        this release, proposed target is rc1

      - Idea of having a staging area for drivers was proposed, idea was
        not generally liked.

      - Issue will be worked by tech board along with PMD maintainers to see
        what resolution can be reached quickly.

Item #3: ABI Policy
      - Issue deferred due to lack of time
      - Issue to be Item #1 on next week's agenda


Item #4: Security Policy
      - The mailing list "security-prerelease@dpdk.org" has been created
      - Member companies must apply to join this list to be informed in
        advance of security issues
            - requests to join are to be sent to techboard@dpdk.org
            - the technical board must then approve those requests
            - companies can have more than one address registered, but
              should keep number very small

Item #5: Removal of examples
      - Follow on from last week - to be discussed publically on mailing
        list rather than just in technical board


Next Meeting: 22nd May 2019. To be chaired by Ferruh Yigit.




                 reply	other threads:[~2019-06-26 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190626101829.GA862@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).