From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F66BA046B
for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 05:44:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58DC5B34;
Fri, 28 Jun 2019 05:44:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CF94C99;
Fri, 28 Jun 2019 05:44:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480332B;
Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qc2400f-1.austin.arm.com (qc2400f-1.austin.arm.com
[10.118.12.65])
by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372563F706;
Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
stable@dpdk.org
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:44:06 -0500
Message-Id: <20190628034406.5399-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1
In-Reply-To: <20190628034406.5399-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
References: <20190628034406.5399-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Test case for rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize is written specifically
for 128 threads. Do not use RTE_MAX_LCORE as it changes for
different configurations.
Fixes: e6a14121f4ae ("test/rcu: remove arbitrary limit on max core count")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
index 0c6267ee9..5d92fbee8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
+++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
@@ -89,13 +89,13 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(void)
sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(0);
TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR((sz != 1), "Get Memsize for 0 threads");
- sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(RTE_MAX_LCORE);
+ sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(128);
/* For 128 threads,
* for machines with cache line size of 64B - 8384
* for machines with cache line size of 128 - 16768
*/
TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR((sz != 8384 && sz != 16768),
- "Get Memsize");
+ "Get Memsize for 128 threads");
return 0;
}
--
2.17.1