DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: deprecation notice for change of ether struct alignment
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:02:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190709150257.GB497@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190709075953.3118d965@hermes.lan>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:59:53AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue,  9 Jul 2019 15:58:36 +0100
> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The ethernet address structure alignment will be changed to 2B alignment in
> > 19.11. Flag this to users.
> > 
> > Impact is expected to be minimal for this change since ethernet addresses
> > are generally 2B aligned anyway.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > index a7796f49b..7a04b9b09 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ API and ABI deprecation notices are to be posted here.
> >  Deprecation Notices
> >  -------------------
> >  
> > +* net: The alignment of the ethernet address structure in DPDK,
> > +  ``rte_ether_addr`` will be increased to two, i.e. 16-bit aligned, in the
> > +  19.11 release. This will only affect any data structures where an ethernet
> > +  address is currently aligned on a single byte boundary.
> > +
> >  * meson: The minimum supported version of meson for configuring and building
> >    DPDK will be increased to v0.47.1 (from 0.41) from DPDK 19.05 onwards. For
> >    those users with a version earlier than 0.47.1, an updated copy of meson
> 
> We should also take the packed off of ether_header and ether_addr.
> Packed is meaningless on ether_addr anyway.

Agreed. However, I don't think that needs to be called out here as it's a
code change with zero impact. The user-impacting change is the alignment
one.

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-09 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-09 14:58 Bruce Richardson
2019-07-09 14:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-09 15:02   ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-07-18 22:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add deprecation notice about changes to ethernet structures Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-19 10:57       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-07-19 16:56     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-23 11:28       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-07-31 10:46         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-08-06 11:26           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-10 20:22             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190709150257.GB497@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).