From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8251A00E6 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:00:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3CD1B464; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:00:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C4214E8 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:00:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2019 07:00:43 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,478,1557212400"; d="scan'208";a="160077177" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.51]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2019 07:00:42 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:00:39 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: chetan bhasin Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20190711140039.GA518@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Dpdk version 17.11.4 (i40e) switchover is not working X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 06:54:31PM +0530, chetan bhasin wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I have figured out the DPDK version , i.e 18.11.2 , where LSC is working > fine for i40e (X722) under bond setup. > > So command-line I am using is > ./testpmd -c f -n 4 --vdev > 'net_bonding0,mode=1,slave=0000:009:00.2,slave=0000:009:00.0,primary=0000:009:00.2' > -- -I > > Can anybody please provide a direction towards which patch I should look > into , as there are lots of changes between dpdk-17.11.4 and dpdk-18.11.2. > I have tried some patches related to i40e driver but no success yet. > Would "git bisect" not work in this case to isolate the relevant patches?