From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, wei.zhao1@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v6] net/e1000: fix i219 hang on reset/close
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:26:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722092631.GA54253@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1563794359-24011-1-git-send-email-xiao.zhang@intel.com>
On 07/22, Xiao Zhang wrote:
>Unit hang may occur if multiple descriptors are available in the rings
>during reset or close. This state can be detected by configure status
>by bit 8 in register. If the bit is set and there are pending
>descriptors in one of the rings, we must flush them before reset or
>close.
>
>Cc: stable@dpdk.org
May need a Fixes tag here.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
>---
>v6 Change the fix on em driver instead of igb driver and update the
>register address according to C-Spec.
>v5 Change the subject.
>v4 Correct the tail descriptor of tx ring.
>v3 Add loop to handle all tx and rx queues.
>v2 Use configuration register instead of NVM7 to get the hang state.
>---
> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethdev.h | 4 ++
> drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 ++
> drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethdev.h
>index 67acb73..01ff943 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethdev.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethdev.h
>@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
> #define IGB_MAX_RX_QUEUE_NUM 8
> #define IGB_MAX_RX_QUEUE_NUM_82576 16
>
>+#define E1000_I219_MAX_RX_QUEUE_NUM 2
>+#define E1000_I219_MAX_TX_QUEUE_NUM 2
>+
> #define E1000_SYN_FILTER_ENABLE 0x00000001 /* syn filter enable field */
> #define E1000_SYN_FILTER_QUEUE 0x0000000E /* syn filter queue field */
> #define E1000_SYN_FILTER_QUEUE_SHIFT 1 /* syn filter queue field */
>@@ -522,5 +525,6 @@ int igb_action_rss_same(const struct rte_flow_action_rss *comp,
> int igb_config_rss_filter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> struct igb_rte_flow_rss_conf *conf,
> bool add);
>+void em_flush_desc_rings(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
>
> #endif /* _E1000_ETHDEV_H_ */
>diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
>index dc88661..62d3a95 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
>@@ -738,6 +738,11 @@ eth_em_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> em_lsc_intr_disable(hw);
>
> e1000_reset_hw(hw);
>+
>+ /* Flush desc rings for i219 */
>+ if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_spt)
>+ em_flush_desc_rings(dev);
>+
> if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_82544)
> E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_WUC, 0);
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c
>index 708f832..880fc7e 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c
>@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <rte_log.h>
> #include <rte_debug.h>
> #include <rte_pci.h>
>+#include <rte_bus_pci.h>
> #include <rte_memory.h>
> #include <rte_memcpy.h>
> #include <rte_memzone.h>
>@@ -59,6 +60,11 @@
> #define E1000_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
> (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ E1000_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
>
>+/* PCI offset for querying configuration status register */
>+#define PCI_CFG_STATUS_REG 0x06
>+#define FLUSH_DESC_REQUIRED 0x100
>+
>+
> /**
> * Structure associated with each descriptor of the RX ring of a RX queue.
> */
>@@ -2000,3 +2006,105 @@ em_txq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> qinfo->conf.tx_rs_thresh = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> qinfo->conf.offloads = txq->offloads;
> }
>+
>+static void e1000_flush_tx_ring(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>+{
>+ struct e1000_hw *hw = E1000_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>+ volatile struct e1000_data_desc *tx_desc;
>+ volatile uint32_t *tdt_reg_addr;
>+ uint32_t tdt, tctl, txd_lower = E1000_TXD_CMD_IFCS;
>+ uint16_t size = 512;
>+ struct em_tx_queue *txq;
>+ int i;
>+
>+ if (dev->data->tx_queues == NULL)
>+ return;
>+ tctl = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_TCTL);
>+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_TCTL, tctl | E1000_TCTL_EN);
>+ for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues &&
>+ i < E1000_I219_MAX_TX_QUEUE_NUM; i++) {
>+ txq = dev->data->tx_queues[i];
>+ tdt = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_TDT(i));
>+ if (tdt != txq->tx_tail)
>+ return;
>+ tx_desc = &txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_tail];
>+ tx_desc->buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(txq->tx_ring_phys_addr);
>+ tx_desc->lower.data = rte_cpu_to_le_32(txd_lower | size);
>+ tx_desc->upper.data = 0;
>+
>+ rte_wmb();
>+ txq->tx_tail++;
>+ if (txq->tx_tail == txq->nb_tx_desc)
>+ txq->tx_tail = 0;
>+ rte_io_wmb();
>+ tdt_reg_addr = E1000_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, E1000_TDT(i));
>+ E1000_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(tdt_reg_addr, txq->tx_tail);
>+ usec_delay(250);
>+ }
>+}
>+
>+static void e1000_flush_rx_ring(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>+{
>+ uint32_t rctl, rxdctl;
>+ struct e1000_hw *hw = E1000_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>+ int i;
>+
>+ rctl = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_RCTL);
>+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_RCTL, rctl & ~E1000_RCTL_EN);
>+ E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
>+ usec_delay(150);
>+
>+ for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues &&
>+ i < E1000_I219_MAX_RX_QUEUE_NUM; i++) {
>+ rxdctl = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_RXDCTL(i));
>+ /* zero the lower 14 bits (prefetch and host thresholds) */
>+ rxdctl &= 0xffffc000;
>+
>+ /* update thresholds: prefetch threshold to 31,
>+ * host threshold to 1 and make sure the granularity
>+ * is "descriptors" and not "cache lines"
>+ */
>+ rxdctl |= (0x1F | (1UL << 8) | E1000_RXDCTL_THRESH_UNIT_DESC);
>+
>+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_RXDCTL(i), rxdctl);
>+ }
>+ /* momentarily enable the RX ring for the changes to take effect */
>+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_RCTL, rctl | E1000_RCTL_EN);
>+ E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
>+ usec_delay(150);
>+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_RCTL, rctl & ~E1000_RCTL_EN);
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * em_flush_desc_rings - remove all descriptors from the descriptor rings
>+ *
>+ * In i219, the descriptor rings must be emptied before resetting/closing the
>+ * HW. Failure to do this will cause the HW to enter a unit hang state which
>+ * can only be released by PCI reset on the device
>+ *
>+ */
>+
>+void em_flush_desc_rings(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>+{
>+ uint32_t fextnvm11, tdlen;
>+ struct e1000_hw *hw = E1000_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>+ struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(dev);
>+ uint16_t hang_state = 0;
>+
>+ fextnvm11 = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_FEXTNVM11);
>+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_FEXTNVM11,
>+ fextnvm11 | E1000_FEXTNVM11_DISABLE_MULR_FIX);
>+ tdlen = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_TDLEN(0));
>+ rte_pci_read_config(pci_dev, &hang_state, sizeof(hang_state),
>+ PCI_CFG_STATUS_REG);
>+
>+ /* do nothing if we're not in faulty state, or if the queue is empty */
>+ if ((hang_state & FLUSH_DESC_REQUIRED) && tdlen) {
>+ /* flush desc ring */
>+ e1000_flush_tx_ring(dev);
>+ rte_pci_read_config(pci_dev, &hang_state, sizeof(hang_state),
>+ PCI_CFG_STATUS_REG);
>+ if (hang_state & FLUSH_DESC_REQUIRED)
>+ e1000_flush_rx_ring(dev);
>+ }
>+}
>--
>2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-22 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-10 0:42 [dpdk-dev] [v4] net/e1000: i219 unit hang issue fix " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-10 4:48 ` Anand H. Krishnan
2019-07-16 1:03 ` Anand H. Krishnan
2019-07-16 2:58 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-10 7:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-11 9:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [v5] net/e1000: fix i219 hang " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-22 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [v6] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-22 9:26 ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2019-07-22 3:18 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-22 12:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [v7] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-22 12:34 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-07-22 15:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [v8] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-24 0:33 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-09-04 12:22 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-09-05 1:33 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-09-05 6:06 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 4:30 ` Zhang, Xiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190722092631.GA54253@intel.com \
--to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).