From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D52A2F18 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2021C01B; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA391C013 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:09:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2019 02:09:09 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,251,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="275651128" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.95]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2019 02:09:07 -0700 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:09:04 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Aaron Conole Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, paulmck@linux.ibm.com, Gavin.Hu@arm.com, Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com Message-ID: <20191003090903.GB1797@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190906094534.36060-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20191001182857.43867-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20191001182857.43867-4-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:02:03AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > Honnappa Nagarahalli writes: > > > Add performance tests for RCU integration. The performance > > difference with and without RCU integration is very small > > (~1% to ~2%) on both Arm and x86 platforms. > > > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang > > --- > > I see the following: > > lib/meson.build:89:5: ERROR: Problem encountered: Missing dependency rcu > for library rte_lpm > > Maybe there's something wrong with the environment? This isn't the > first time I've seen a dependency detection problem with meson. > It probably not a detection problem, more likely the rcu library is not being built for some reason. If you apply patch [1] the meson run will print out each library and the dependency object generated for it as each is processed. That should help debug issues like this. /Bruce [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/59470/