From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDDCA2F6B for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:13:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6981BFC4; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxy.6wind.com (host.76.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com [62.23.145.76]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F6D1BFAF for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from glumotte.dev.6wind.com (unknown [10.16.0.195]) by proxy.6wind.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD423297D8; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:13:13 +0200 From: Olivier Matz To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20191008081313.GP7277@glumotte.dev.6wind.com> References: <20190928003758.18489-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20191007154343.8556-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20191007154343.8556-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191007154343.8556-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] mbuf: don't generate invalid mbuf in clone test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:43:39AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The test for cloning changed mbuf would generate an mbuf > whose length and segments were invalid. This would cause a crash > if test was run with mbuf debugging enabled. > > Fixes: f1022aba76a5 ("app/test: rename mbuf variable") > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Acked-by: Olivier Matz