From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
harry.van.haaren@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
arybchenko@solarflare.com,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:11:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023101111.81742-3-mb@smartsharesystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023101111.81742-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs.
Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
v9:
* Fix a typo in a description.
* In the unit test, make chain length a #define and add a few
RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON().
* The unit test prints when allocating the mbuf pools for the bulk tests.
Also print when freeing them.
v8:
* Add unit test, covering both bulk alloc and bulk free.
v7:
* Squash multiple modifications into one.
v6:
* Remove __rte_always_inline from static function.
The compiler will inline anyway.
v5:
* Rename variables from "free" to "pending" for improved readability.
* Add prefix __ to rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
* Add array size parameter to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
The compiler will optimize the parameter away anyway.
* Add description to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
* Minor description updates.
v4:
* Mark as experimental by adding __rte_experimental.
* Add function to experimental section of map file.
* Fix source code formatting regarding pointer to pointer.
* Squash multiple modifications into one.
v3:
* Bugfix: Handle pakets with multiple segments.
* Add inline helper function, mainly for readability.
* Fix source code formatting regarding indentation.
v2:
* Function is not inline.
* Optimize to free multible mbufs belonging to the same mempool in
bulk. Inspired by ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(), but allowing NULL pointers
in the array, just like rte_pktmbuf_free() can take a NULL pointer.
* Use unsigned int instead of unsigned. Passes checkpatch, but
mismatches the original coding style of the modified files.
* Fix a typo in the description headline: mempools is plural.
---
app/test/test_mbuf.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 179 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
index b9c2b2500..c21ef64c8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <sys/queue.h>
#include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_errno.h>
#include <rte_debug.h>
#include <rte_log.h>
#include <rte_memory.h>
@@ -39,6 +40,9 @@
#define MBUF_TEST_HDR2_LEN 30
#define MBUF_TEST_ALL_HDRS_LEN (MBUF_TEST_HDR1_LEN+MBUF_TEST_HDR2_LEN)
+/* chain length in bulk test */
+#define CHAIN_LEN 16
+
/* size of private data for mbuf in pktmbuf_pool2 */
#define MBUF2_PRIV_SIZE 128
@@ -700,6 +704,175 @@ test_pktmbuf_pool(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * test bulk allocation and bulk free of mbufs
+ */
+static int
+test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk(void)
+{
+ struct rte_mempool *pool = NULL;
+ struct rte_mempool *pool2 = NULL;
+ unsigned int i;
+ struct rte_mbuf *m;
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbufs[NB_MBUF];
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* We cannot use the preallocated mbuf pools because their caches
+ * prevent us from bulk allocating all objects in them.
+ * So we create our own mbuf pools without caches.
+ */
+ printf("Create mbuf pools for bulk allocation.\n");
+ pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk",
+ NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+ if (pool == NULL) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n",
+ rte_errno);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ pool2 = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk2",
+ NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+ if (pool2 == NULL) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n",
+ rte_errno);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* Preconditions: Mempools must be full. */
+ if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) {
+ printf("Test precondition failed: mempools not full\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == NB_MBUF &&
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == NB_MBUF)) {
+ printf("Test precondition failed: mempools: %u+%u != %u+%u",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(pool),
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2),
+ NB_MBUF, NB_MBUF);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ printf("Test single bulk alloc, followed by multiple bulk free.\n");
+
+ /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */
+ ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */
+ if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) {
+ printf("mempool not empty\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* Bulk free all mbufs, in four steps. */
+ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(NB_MBUF % 4 != 0);
+ for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4);
+ /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
+ if (rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) != i + NB_MBUF / 4) {
+ printf("mempool avail count incorrect\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ printf("Test multiple bulk alloc, followed by single bulk free.\n");
+
+ /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in four steps. */
+ for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) {
+ ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, &mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+ /* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */
+ if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) {
+ printf("mempool not empty\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* Bulk free all mbufs, in one go. */
+ rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, NB_MBUF);
+ /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
+ if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) {
+ printf("mempool not full\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ printf("Test bulk free of single long chain.\n");
+
+ /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */
+ ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* Create a long mbuf chain. */
+ for (i = 1; i < NB_MBUF; i++) {
+ ret = rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[0], mbufs[i]);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_chain() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ mbufs[i] = NULL;
+ }
+ /* Free the mbuf chain containing all the mbufs. */
+ rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1);
+ /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
+ if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) {
+ printf("mempool not full\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ printf("Test bulk free of multiple chains using multiple pools.\n");
+
+ /* Create mbuf chains containing mbufs from different pools. */
+ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(CHAIN_LEN % 2 != 0);
+ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(NB_MBUF % (CHAIN_LEN / 2) != 0);
+ for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF * 2; i++) {
+ m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc((i & 4) ? pool2 : pool);
+ if (m == NULL) {
+ printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc() failed (%u)\n", i);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ if ((i % CHAIN_LEN) == 0)
+ mbufs[i / CHAIN_LEN] = m;
+ else
+ rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[i / CHAIN_LEN], m);
+ }
+ /* Test that both pools have been emptied. */
+ if (!(rte_mempool_empty(pool) && rte_mempool_empty(pool2))) {
+ printf("mempools not empty\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* Free one mbuf chain. */
+ rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1);
+ /* Test that the segments have been returned to the pools. */
+ if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == CHAIN_LEN / 2 &&
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == CHAIN_LEN / 2)) {
+ printf("all segments of first mbuf have not been returned\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* Free the remaining mbuf chains. */
+ rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[1], NB_MBUF * 2 / CHAIN_LEN - 1);
+ /* Test that they have been returned to the pools. */
+ if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) {
+ printf("mempools not full\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = 0;
+ goto done;
+
+err:
+ ret = -1;
+
+done:
+ printf("Free mbuf pools for bulk allocation.\n");
+ rte_mempool_free(pool);
+ rte_mempool_free(pool2);
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly
*/
@@ -1317,6 +1490,12 @@ test_mbuf(void)
goto err;
}
+ /* test bulk mbuf alloc and free */
+ if (test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() < 0) {
+ printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() failed\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
/* test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly */
if (test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr(pktmbuf_pool) < 0) {
printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr() failed\n");
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-23 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 10:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup
2019-10-23 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/2] " Morten Brørup
2019-10-23 10:11 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2019-10-24 0:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191023101111.81742-3-mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).