From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: "Cui, LunyuanX" <lunyuanx.cui@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix link status update
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:28:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191118032836.GD69793@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D03A2340CBF5CC478EBBD0ABAE6ADB152F150E@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 11/18, Cui, LunyuanX wrote:
>Hi, Xiaolong
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ye, Xiaolong
>> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 11:07 AM
>> To: Cui, LunyuanX <lunyuanx.cui@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>;
>> stable@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix link status update
>>
>> On 11/15, Lunyuan Cui wrote:
>> >Unassigned variable should not be used as judgment, and there is no
>> >need to update link status according to old link status.
>> >This patch fix the issue.
>> >
>> >Fixes: 80ba61115e77 ("net/e1000: use link status helper functions")
>> >Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Lunyuan Cui <lunyuanx.cui@intel.com>
>> >---
>> > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 4 ++--
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
>> >b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 9a88b50b2..7959ee4e9 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
>> >@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ eth_em_link_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> int wait_to_complete)
>> > memset(&link, 0, sizeof(link));
>> >
>> > /* Now we check if a transition has happened */
>> >- if (link_check && (link.link_status == ETH_LINK_DOWN)) {
>> >+ if (link_check) {
>> > uint16_t duplex, speed;
>> > hw->mac.ops.get_link_up_info(hw, &speed, &duplex);
>> > link.link_duplex = (duplex == FULL_DUPLEX) ?
>> >@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ eth_em_link_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> int wait_to_complete)
>> > link.link_status = ETH_LINK_UP;
>> > link.link_autoneg = !(dev->data->dev_conf.link_speeds &
>> > ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED);
>> >- } else if (!link_check && (link.link_status == ETH_LINK_UP)) {
>> >+ } else {
>> > link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_NONE;
>> > link.link_duplex = ETH_LINK_HALF_DUPLEX;
>> > link.link_status = ETH_LINK_DOWN;
>>
>> I am a little confused about the variable link_check, is it used to indicate
>> whether there is link status change or link status up?
>
>The variable link_check is used to indicate link status up.
>When link_check is true, link status is up.
>When link_check is false, link status is down.
Then the link_check seems a bad name, could you help submit a patch to rename it?
@whenzhuo, could you help review/ack this change?
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>Thanks,
>Lunyuan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 17:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Cui LunyuanX
2019-11-14 6:41 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-15 14:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Lunyuan Cui
2019-11-18 3:06 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-18 3:21 ` Cui, LunyuanX
2019-11-18 3:28 ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2019-11-18 14:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Lunyuan Cui
2019-11-18 7:23 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-19 6:43 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2019-11-20 9:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Lunyuan Cui
2019-11-26 2:24 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-26 2:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Lu, Wenzhuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191118032836.GD69793@intel.com \
--to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lunyuanx.cui@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).