From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC6CA04B3;
	Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:48:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA171F1C;
	Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:48:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com
 [209.85.216.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E4D1252
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:48:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id t101so4709599pjb.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:48:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UvrBcJs1/YqLuXrgtcvhaPW/fbuq1JVaJ9r4obQkrdk=;
 b=Tla3nDa5lT8nNyFkopx7z31C8cwTBXyuus/7/c62EInd7cKOhrAUCS5VVkYotbwVwl
 Osr3ZK+yG4+zBvW4+zTcfctI60ziH9lG7Q6WTjvO7oCY6gyE+KwD5mWTV9GYW64etQod
 AErnLi+YzFHECHLsCb9p+WMLVWUe6FcXEjRuv1/0J3jYQNymqXoqwlQ6BzZQR9gDJk3v
 VmJr2Jz6Q6AMslO4AFx8adujr1KrD98PzDyNsOFQmTChXONeluGogzD9/FoBhNJS4Q8Y
 NyMTwF2/TxTK2B/Kq1dclUT7vO5uDZPqACIvzJL5tLTniIUHCAI35D1H5/0lRAcUTRG3
 HQGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UvrBcJs1/YqLuXrgtcvhaPW/fbuq1JVaJ9r4obQkrdk=;
 b=WTCfRd96v/TOiyS2HrvvKlaPyZH4yWX980dMPcPD8aJOMprE0Oelz82uQXjQ08k8gv
 zG1wkyZDzvyUKZ9L0bYlFwfjLIAbOwgtyhUTjF7ugkHBCc92Vy+XJJSzjATik4bAN370
 jOye4zV14F6P/L+ydpp3Why4DWWsN6+ggQX0sanCVE1lyF85Q4N8VdFjruEvvDlS7CAR
 AtXRAhk0ASVn7mHsI8kD36z1fC4Qw21YBfmQjdtc7vkyEsKYF/v6aG2QBtZIOBx6/bXg
 3xkLFcZZVwadVera5LgQ2C6DCapGu+E/Kra+em8SjzYwmeRJt4epQwkTdkGdfiYhYCXw
 DDxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJzTmRr3osdYJ21HBoNwnfGzoeu/OQacyKsehukQefkvlv0N5X
 xRYRAAOCjm/ChefvhtTmubzIUw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwd05ekQHvJkSsUGdBWlBkpS8Dck5L/cfrizG3I4gq2RnHPFmWf+63slfaCX2S+qoUk9dNffw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb93:: with SMTP id
 m19mr17437576pls.37.1576878521157; 
 Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u127sm14705848pfc.95.2019.12.20.13.48.40
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:48:31 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20191220134831.48f97ddf@hermes.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dpdk-dev] KNI portmask bugs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

KNI example has a couple of bugs that can cause surprises if using
failsafe (or bonding). The portmask argument to kni does not check
that device is not a sub device (already owned) and allows any device.

While your at it, the portmask for kni is only 32 bits which is not
big enough on some systems.