From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8196CD1 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 1so30637212wmz.1 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1aJU9nPGH0LeiQ8zkONYj7lgXT3XnmwHqxIm7gdvpz8=; b=fUERwS08h7Df5+8V1sTEpup2i9jnDNoRMVAdmUidKdeLfLq0dYy/NbcVVswbNfqkkk xmnGLUXCjAtwEAC6GRmV+tlKSYUjQWcBhT8t+xjl59cCd9SxsyJvfnFDlbIKrfCMOom3 +D/Y6FIpT5ORxBT58shSdA8zIYmJLuQjb4uhinWFCFFLoiA/3N8x8TlvByu2iVI+TAWe KrGD7Fjq/qg0fuDulL5a2AfLnbcJZFyJciVB8cVleOdgN40DgN20vf/gt/BfseWDCQ0s tBbBAS8+JvZA3J9+752+f770mR7Ss67lw0YXqSTaQ3oAJmVQ04nsCdH05VttT4Ror3wT m0jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1aJU9nPGH0LeiQ8zkONYj7lgXT3XnmwHqxIm7gdvpz8=; b=JZlb4hAY5DNW9TtaGaL1uXBIhROiDnFnW2F7/pgVsCBDr3NhjOrduwNY37JusrNaey 2BxTVcrkjOv83QsP6yxYSV/kVgJFS9jH9CaDZP+MxipuWNW1U+h8sxG2XWmZO4pNduCh iD/0jIWuoBvaiqoN+QJ8serMRBmEKTQLoQI/EIQCE/uKvzY4BAM3P9sdNg75aB/VRBd8 6dqA6OOSUcTb1U6mhNu5qv5NiIn7hnQoxQzv6k7k1EKIxUZFCwA9CeUyR5B88RjpTRic 8PqOjRytI9JleW8FKosvEoER/2PJjHynlNE/cYdh79cXgh+OeTOx3W9kXnR2PhxkG15p 7QoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOnZIrzW+/D7tY8IZBZNV+i/Dywz7u4jZn6PCvcRkFROqo0/sZcNNKBKQReZk7EnKc2 X-Received: by 10.28.55.67 with SMTP id e64mr2929764wma.107.1473424829252; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i127sm2559799wmf.4.2016.09.09.05.40.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:40:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , zhouyangchao , dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 14:40:27 +0200 Message-ID: <2019611.627KgLZ47A@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <05b14d74-b168-69b2-b107-124ee951dc27@intel.com> References: <1473389167-2758-1-git-send-email-zhouyates@gmail.com> <20160908094442.4dfa5b01@xeon-e3> <05b14d74-b168-69b2-b107-124ee951dc27@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: unregister an unregisterd net_device could cause a kernel crash X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 12:40:29 -0000 2016-09-08 18:15, Ferruh Yigit: > On 9/8/2016 5:44 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > ... > > > But then again the whole KNI driver fails completely when > > running kernel style check. > > > > Yes, it generates lots of warnings. > I can fix them (excluding ethtool/*), that wouldn't take much time but > how syntax only patches welcomed? Another concern is it trashes git blame. You ask a question and give the answer ;) I think it depends just on the balance of the pros/cons - to be evaluated.