From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BD6A054E; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:10:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122BE49E0; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:10:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0BF374 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:10:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id w15so14687374wru.4 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:10:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=YVE+BVunAjrcymgorH3teQ0+ORMi/wUw+vliWTEnJZY=; b=KhBisMzmbBxeIr071wCNxo+EmLMhNhVd1Ms4PMDCCndRtChm5lz7W/rWa6b+6O7F1p YGP6ogJ3h56yPiVpAZRdHn26PoVMnpiizlO2GTCz28PChHPW4UDfy3zyXinORbM8SD1f cl3XJjA9+gl6z+LmcQH9rwRiVfVEZroPdku/M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=YVE+BVunAjrcymgorH3teQ0+ORMi/wUw+vliWTEnJZY=; b=P3fnBQqJAR6PxaVEM2s5RMJJYT0JQwUAsiqi7jGP4dZYdbJoPsQ0JCFvnMFhYAJ+da GO9ccaKA1kkWZ6GxcDMhwsG4hum1dyR5S6T8YwcMgex2upJD6PYqXtViVWwC04xUrRH6 dWVbi7K7SUDTwPikVn5IWmHVpJiCENKWvKiqXUXNSRlQ3Mfa933cg6NNtikUYraN78ux lgC4bgIVK3gpVCNfwdoDuYk2QlQ6FHMZ409OXuGu9LBM6V/aGUIjTNzn5ZQBCcn8jZ5L TNxgY6+TnSoLevQejeH0WFj1XVVbb6Z99jy8ZcLcJiWQ1ite7+54I+1ToeYjDkSNzP/h fKDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdDzK/HEanfT8EQeWh0ZdLRZRlxukJap1by81OKMMCVFSKqMdO 77gqSey6NpdF6NnpJI5eF+BgEw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw/sOFUYOsqDtdW4O0Z4ITop6o7SALJN1a7NsGUzah1WEUAr91zytwYjgzaYExdDKJCr+1cQA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:c3d0:: with SMTP id d16mr10495406wrg.376.1581786619399; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (69-218-223-106.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net. [69.218.223.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm12071226wmg.22.2020.02.15.09.10.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:10:18 -0800 (PST) From: Lance Richardson To: thomas@monjalon.net Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Lance Richardson Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:09:50 -0500 Message-Id: <20200215170950.11628-1-lance.richardson@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <71ad489e-8030-fb06-b405-f29f6c3bc8ea@intel.com> References: <71ad489e-8030-fb06-b405-f29f6c3bc8ea@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] devtools: check c99 comment use in checkpatches.sh X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" C99-style comments are not permitted according to DPDK coding style guidelines, enable checking for these by checkpatch.pl. Signed-off-by: Lance Richardson --- v2: * Fixed a typo in commit message. devtools/checkpatches.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/devtools/checkpatches.sh b/devtools/checkpatches.sh index b16bace92..c996a8780 100755 --- a/devtools/checkpatches.sh +++ b/devtools/checkpatches.sh @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ VOLATILE,PREFER_PACKED,PREFER_ALIGNED,PREFER_PRINTF,\ PREFER_KERNEL_TYPES,BIT_MACRO,CONST_STRUCT,\ SPLIT_STRING,LONG_LINE_STRING,\ LINE_SPACING,PARENTHESIS_ALIGNMENT,NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE,\ -NEW_TYPEDEFS,COMPARISON_TO_NULL" +NEW_TYPEDEFS,COMPARISON_TO_NULL,C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE" options="$options $DPDK_CHECKPATCH_OPTIONS" print_usage () { -- 2.17.1