From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B506A0350; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C101C1A2; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:47:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1331C06A for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:47:40 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: 12q1MT6alrrU7o13ehcokxXd4c34OsrX3SlqX9f43wuJ+jrxYY0KDFORAsp3jCbwSq5jfCFxtb d6fKB22x6Tew== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2020 06:47:39 -0700 IronPort-SDR: Z7LP4NByO5KbXCtdE6/oNUGur/pPeA/qyZxtjDdE+GZUcF5kYzikbh0ryKD8pUxdd2YH+nOVvB /e7NOJQoPJdQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,380,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="436697723" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.17.48]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 May 2020 06:47:37 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:47:34 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Kevin Laatz , Ciara Power , Keith Wiles Message-ID: <20200511134734.GD1957@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200511133212.21444-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200511133212.21444-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] telemetry: fix build for armv7 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:32:12PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > telemetry can not depend on EAL anymore but it still wants to get arch > headers. > We directly point at the right source directories by using the same logic > than EAL. However the special case of armv7 has been missed. > No objection to the fix, but why is ARMv7 needing special treatment?