DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gaëtan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net, dev@dpdk.org,
	orika@mellanox.com, matan@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:49:57 +0200
Message-ID: <20200629154957.laaew2777qur5tux@u256.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200621191200.28120-5-parav@mellanox.com>

On 21/06/20 19:11 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Create a mlx5 bus driver framework for invoking drivers of
> multiple classes who have registered with the mlx5_pci bus
> driver.
> 
> Validate user class arguments for supported class combinations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1->v2:
>  - Address comments from Thomas and Gaetan
>  - Enhanced driver to honor RTE_PCI_DRV_PROBE_AGAIN drv_flag
>  - Use anonymous structure for class search and code changes around it
>  - Define static for class comination array
>  - Use RTE_DIM to find array size
>  - Added OOM check for strdup()
>  - Renamed copy variable to nstr_orig
>  - Returning negagive error code
>  - Returning directly if match entry found
>  - Use compat condition check
>  - Avoided cutting error message string
>  - USe uint32_t datatype instead of enum mlx5_class
>  - Changed logic to parse device arguments only once during probe()
>  - Added check to fail driver probe if multiple classes register with
>    DMA ops
>  - Renamed function to parse_class_options
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/Makefile           |   2 +
>  drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/meson.build        |   2 +-
>  drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/mlx5_pci_bus.c     | 290 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/Makefile b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/Makefile
> index 7db977ba8..e53ed8856 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
>  CFLAGS += -I$(RTE_SDK)/drivers/common/mlx5
>  CFLAGS += -I$(BUILDDIR)/drivers/common/mlx5
>  CFLAGS += -I$(RTE_SDK)/drivers/bus/pci
> +CFLAGS += -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE
>  LDLIBS += -lrte_eal
> +LDLIBS += -lrte_kvargs
>  LDLIBS += -lrte_common_mlx5
>  LDLIBS += -lrte_pci -lrte_bus_pci
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/meson.build b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/meson.build
> index cc4a84e23..5111baa4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/meson.build
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/meson.build
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>  # Copyright(c) 2020 Mellanox Technologies Ltd
>  
> -deps += ['pci', 'bus_pci', 'common_mlx5']
> +deps += ['pci', 'bus_pci', 'common_mlx5', 'kvargs']
>  install_headers('rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h')
>  sources = files('mlx5_pci_bus.c')
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/mlx5_pci_bus.c b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/mlx5_pci_bus.c
> index 66db3c7b0..e8f1649a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/mlx5_pci_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/mlx5_pci_bus.c
> @@ -3,12 +3,302 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include "rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h"
> +#include <mlx5_common_utils.h>
>  
>  static TAILQ_HEAD(mlx5_pci_bus_drv_head, rte_mlx5_pci_driver) drv_list =
>  				TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(drv_list);
>  
> +static const struct {
> +	const char *name;
> +	unsigned int dev_class;

Let me quote you when you refused to follow my comment:

>> Yes, I acked to changed to define, but I forgot that I use the enum here.
>> So I am going to keep the enum as code reads more clear with enum.

You refused to use a fixed-width integer type as per my past comments,
for readability reasons, but changed the type to "unsigned int" instead.

I insisted in the previous commit on uint32_t for exposed ABI (even if
between internal libs). Here I accept some leeway given the
compilation-unit scope of the definition. But at this point, your choice
is certainly *NOT* to use a vague type instead.

> +} mlx5_classes[] = {

mlx5_class_names.

> +	{ .name = "vdpa", .dev_class = MLX5_CLASS_VDPA },
> +	{ .name = "net", .dev_class = MLX5_CLASS_NET },
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned int mlx5_valid_class_combo[] = {
> +	MLX5_CLASS_NET,
> +	MLX5_CLASS_VDPA,
> +	/* New class combination should be added here */

This comment seems redundant, new class combo will be added wherever
appropriate, leave it to future dev.

> +};
> +
> +static int class_name_to_val(const char *class_name)

I think mlx5_class_from_name() is better.
(with mlx5_ namespace.)

> +{
> +	unsigned int i;

In general, size_t is the type of array iterators in C.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(mlx5_classes); i++) {
> +		if (strcmp(class_name, mlx5_classes[i].name) == 0)
> +			return mlx5_classes[i].dev_class;
> +
> +	}
> +	return -EINVAL;

You're mixing signed int and enum mlx5_class as return type.
Please find another way of signaling error that will make you keep the enum.

You have a sentinel value describing explicitly an invalid class, it seems perfectly
suited instead of -EINVAL. Use it instead.

> +}
> +
> +static int
> +mlx5_bus_opt_handler(__rte_unused const char *key, const char *class_names,
> +		     void *opaque)
> +{
> +	int *ret = opaque;
> +	char *nstr_org;
> +	int class_val;
> +	char *found;
> +	char *nstr;
> +
> +	*ret = 0;
> +	nstr = strdup(class_names);
> +	if (!nstr) {

Please be explicit and use (nstr == NULL).

> +		*ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		return *ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	nstr_org = nstr;

nstr_orig is more readable.

> +	while (nstr) {
        while (nstr != NULL) {

> +		/* Extract each individual class name */
> +		found = strsep(&nstr, ":");
> +		if (!found)

        ditto

> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Check if its a valid class */
> +		class_val = class_name_to_val(found);
> +		if (class_val < 0) {

if (class_val == MLX5_CLASS_INVALID),
with the proper API change.

> +			*ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		*ret |= class_val;

Once again, mixing ints and enum mlx5_class.
You don't *have* to set *ret on error.

* Change your opaque out_arg to uint32_t, stop using variable width types for bitmaps.

* Do not set it on error, use a tmp u32 for parsing and only set it once everything is ok.

* rte_kvargs_process() will mask your error values anyway, so instead set rte_errno and return -1.
  On negative return, it will itself return -1. Check for < 0 in bus_options_valid()

> +	}
> +err:
> +	free(nstr_org);
> +	if (*ret < 0)
> +		DRV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid mlx5 class options %s. Maybe typo in device class argument setting?",

Find a way to give the exact source of error. If it is an invalid name, show which token failed to be parsed
(meaning move your error code before nstr_orig is freed). Remove the "Maybe" formulation.

By the way, Thomas' comment was correct instead of mine, you should just cut your format string after
the "%s.".

> +			class_names);
> +	return *ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +parse_class_options(const struct rte_devargs *devargs)
> +{
> +	const char *key = MLX5_CLASS_ARG_NAME;
> +	struct rte_kvargs *kvlist;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (devargs == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +	kvlist = rte_kvargs_parse(devargs->args, NULL);
> +	if (kvlist == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, key))
> +		rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, key, mlx5_bus_opt_handler, &ret);

Set ret to rte_kvargs_process() return value instead, define a specific u32 for bitmap.
Find a way to output the bitmap *separately* from the error code, or
set MLX5_CLASS_INVALID in the bitmap before returning it as sole return value for this function.
(meaning having a proper bit value for MLX5_CLASS_INVALID, if you go this way.)

I already said it in previous review, I will reformulate: stop overloading your types,
relying on implicit casts between correct and incorrect values, and merging your returned values
and the error channel.

Please be proactive into cleaning up your APIs.

> +	rte_kvargs_free(kvlist);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  void
>  rte_mlx5_pci_driver_register(struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *driver)
>  {
>  	TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&drv_list, driver, next);
>  }
> +
> +static bool
> +mlx5_bus_match(const struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *drv,
> +	       const struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
> +{
> +	const struct rte_pci_id *id_table;
> +
> +	for (id_table = drv->pci_driver.id_table; id_table->vendor_id != 0;
> +	     id_table++) {
> +		/* check if device's ids match the class driver's ones */
> +		if (id_table->vendor_id != pci_dev->id.vendor_id &&
> +				id_table->vendor_id != PCI_ANY_ID)
> +			continue;
> +		if (id_table->device_id != pci_dev->id.device_id &&
> +				id_table->device_id != PCI_ANY_ID)
> +			continue;
> +		if (id_table->subsystem_vendor_id !=
> +		    pci_dev->id.subsystem_vendor_id &&
> +		    id_table->subsystem_vendor_id != PCI_ANY_ID)
> +			continue;
> +		if (id_table->subsystem_device_id !=
> +		    pci_dev->id.subsystem_device_id &&
> +		    id_table->subsystem_device_id != PCI_ANY_ID)
> +			continue;
> +		if (id_table->class_id != pci_dev->id.class_id &&
> +				id_table->class_id != RTE_CLASS_ANY_ID)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int is_valid_class_combo(uint32_t user_classes)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;

size_t

> +
> +	/* Verify if user specified valid supported combination */
                                    a valid combination.
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(mlx5_valid_class_combo); i++) {
> +		if (mlx5_valid_class_combo[i] == user_classes)

You simplified the scope of this function, which is good.
However, given the more limited scope, now it becomes a boolean
yes/no.

You are returning (0 | false) for yes, which is not ok.

reading if (is_valid_class_combo(combo)) { handle_error(combo); } is pretty
awkward.

While you're at it, you might want to use a proper bool instead.

> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +	/* Not found any valid class combination */
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int validate_single_class_dma_ops(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *class;
> +	int dma_map_classes = 0;
> +
> +	TAILQ_FOREACH(class, &drv_list, next) {
> +		if (class->pci_driver.dma_map)
> +			dma_map_classes++;
> +	}
> +	if (dma_map_classes > 1) {
> +		DRV_LOG(ERR, "Multiple classes with DMA ops is unsupported");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * DPDK callback to register to probe multiple PCI class devices.
> + *
> + * @param[in] pci_drv
> + *   PCI driver structure.
> + * @param[in] dev
> + *   PCI device information.
> + *
> + * @return
> + *   0 on success, 1 to skip this driver, a negative errno value otherwise
> + *   and rte_errno is set.
> + */
> +static int
> +mlx5_bus_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *drv __rte_unused,

drv is not unused, you are passing it to sub-drivers below.

> +		   struct rte_pci_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *class;

This compilation unit targets a C compiler. I think only
headers should ensure compat with C++, but this name is not great still.

driver seems more appropriate anyway to designate a driver.

> +	uint32_t user_classes = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +

Mixing ret and user_classes as you do afterward is the result of the above API issues
already outlined. I won't go over them again, please fix everything to have proper
type discipline.

> +	ret = validate_single_class_dma_ops();
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = parse_class_options(dev->device.devargs);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	user_classes = ret;
> +	if (user_classes) {
> +		/* Validate combination here */
> +		ret = is_valid_class_combo(user_classes);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			DRV_LOG(ERR, "Unsupported mlx5 classes supplied");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Default to net class */
> +	if (user_classes == 0)
> +		user_classes = MLX5_CLASS_NET;
> +
> +	TAILQ_FOREACH(class, &drv_list, next) {
> +		if (!mlx5_bus_match(class, dev))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if ((class->dev_class & user_classes) == 0)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		if (class->loaded) {
> +			/* If already loaded and class driver can handle
> +			 * reprobe, probe such class driver again.
> +			 */
> +			if (class->pci_driver.drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_PROBE_AGAIN)
> +				ret = class->pci_driver.probe(drv, dev);

Using "drv" here instead of "class" means you are overriding the DRV_FLAG set by the
sub-driver.

Why not use "class" instead? dev->driver is setup by the upper layer, so will be correctly set
to drv instead of class.

> +		} else {
> +			ret = class->pci_driver.probe(drv, dev);
> +		}

You are ignoring probe() < 0 here, seems wrong.

> +		if (!ret)
> +			class->loaded = true;

loaded flag is not properly set.
You will set it on first successful probe, even on further errors.

Instead, use a u32 to mark each properly probed classes, then set loaded outside of this loop,
only if this "probed" bitmap matches exactly the "user_classes" bitmap.

This means also not silently ignoring dev and class mismatch. If this is the behavior you
explicitly want, then you will need to unset the mismatched class in the user_classes, so that the
exact match on probed is correct. Otherwise, logging an error is more appropriate.

> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * DPDK callback to remove one or more class devices for a PCI device.
> + *
> + * This function removes all class devices belong to a given PCI device.
> + *
> + * @param[in] pci_dev
> + *   Pointer to the PCI device.
> + *
> + * @return
> + *   0 on success, the function cannot fail.
> + */
> +static int
> +mlx5_bus_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *class;
> +
> +	/* Remove each class driver in reverse order */
> +	TAILQ_FOREACH_REVERSE(class, &drv_list, mlx5_pci_bus_drv_head, next) {
> +		if (class->loaded)
> +			class->pci_driver.remove(dev);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +mlx5_bus_pci_dma_map(struct rte_pci_device *dev, void *addr,
> +		     uint64_t iova, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *class;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	TAILQ_FOREACH(class, &drv_list, next) {
> +		if (!class->pci_driver.dma_map)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		return class->pci_driver.dma_map(dev, addr, iova, len);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +mlx5_bus_pci_dma_unmap(struct rte_pci_device *dev, void *addr,
> +		       uint64_t iova, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver *class;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	TAILQ_FOREACH_REVERSE(class, &drv_list, mlx5_pci_bus_drv_head, next) {
> +		if (!class->pci_driver.dma_unmap)
> +			continue;
> +

I see no additional logging about edge-cases that were discussed previously.
You can add them to the register function.

> +		return class->pci_driver.dma_unmap(dev, addr, iova, len);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rte_pci_id mlx5_bus_pci_id_map[] = {
> +	{
> +		.vendor_id = 0
> +	}
> +};
> +
> +static struct rte_pci_driver mlx5_bus_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "mlx5_bus_pci",
> +	},
> +	.id_table = mlx5_bus_pci_id_map,
> +	.probe = mlx5_bus_pci_probe,
> +	.remove = mlx5_bus_pci_remove,
> +	.dma_map = mlx5_bus_pci_dma_map,
> +	.dma_unmap = mlx5_bus_pci_dma_unmap,
> +	.drv_flags = RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC | RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_RMV |
> +		     RTE_PCI_DRV_PROBE_AGAIN,
> +};
> +
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(mlx5_bus, mlx5_bus_driver);
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(mlx5_bus, mlx5_bus_pci_id_map);
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h
> index 571f7dfd6..c8cd7187b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mlx5_pci/rte_bus_mlx5_pci.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct rte_mlx5_pci_driver {
>  	enum mlx5_class dev_class;		/**< Class of this driver */
>  	struct rte_pci_driver pci_driver;	/**< Inherit core pci driver. */
>  	TAILQ_ENTRY(rte_mlx5_pci_driver) next;
> +	bool loaded;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 

-- 
Gaëtan

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-29 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 193+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 17:17 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Improve mlx5 PMD common driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-06-10 17:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/6] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-06-15 19:33   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-17  8:05     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-18  9:25       ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-18 12:16         ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-18 12:22           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-18 13:20             ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-21 19:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve mlx5 PMD common driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-06-21 19:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-06-21 19:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-06-21 19:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-06-29 14:01       ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-21 19:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-06-29 15:49       ` Gaëtan Rivet [this message]
2020-06-21 19:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-06-21 19:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] common/mlx5: Remove class checks from individual driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/10] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/10] eal: introduce RTE common initialization level Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/10] common/mlx5: fix empty input style in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/10] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/10] common/mlx5: use common rte priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/10] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/10] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 12:53       ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/10] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/10] common/mlx5: remove class checks from individual driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03  9:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/10] maintainers: add maintainers for mlx5 pci bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/10] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-07-06 10:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/10] eal: introduce macros for getting valuefor bit Morten Brørup
2020-07-07 11:38         ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-07 12:13           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-07 12:40             ` Morten Brørup
2020-07-09  6:23               ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:15                 ` Morten Brørup
2020-07-09  7:30                   ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/10] eal: introduce RTE common initialization level Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/10] common/mlx5: fix empty input style in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/10] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/10] common/mlx5: use common rte priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/10] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/10] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/10] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/10] common/mlx5: remove class checks from individual driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-03 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/10] maintainers: add maintainers for mlx5 pci bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/9] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/9] eal: introduce RTE common initialization level Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/9] common/mlx5: fix empty input style in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/9] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] common/mlx5: use common rte priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/9] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/9] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/9] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-09  7:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 9/9] common/mlx5: remove class checks from individual driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/9] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/9] eal: introduce RTE common initialization level Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/9] common/mlx5: fix empty input style in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/9] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/9] common/mlx5: use common rte priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/9] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/9] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 8/9] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-16  7:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 9/9] common/mlx5: remove class checks from individual driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/9] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/9] eal: introduce macros for getting value for bit Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/9] eal: introduce RTE common initialization level Parav Pandit
2020-07-20 16:21       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-20 16:48         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-20 16:58           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-20 17:26             ` Ori Kam
2020-07-20 18:28               ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-20 19:19                 ` Ori Kam
2020-07-20 19:08           ` David Marchand
2020-07-20 19:30             ` Ori Kam
2020-07-21  9:34               ` David Marchand
2020-07-21 11:18                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-21 11:29                   ` David Marchand
2020-07-21 12:10                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-21 12:13                     ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-21 12:26                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-21 12:51                         ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-21 13:07                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/9] common/mlx5: fix empty input style in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/9] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/9] common/mlx5: use common rte priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/9] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 7/9] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 8/9] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-17 13:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 9/9] common/mlx5: remove class checks from individual driver Parav Pandit
2020-07-19  7:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/9] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Raslan Darawsheh
2020-07-23 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/10] " Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 01/10] eal: introduce macro for bit definition Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 02/10] drivers: fix indent of directory list Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 10:44       ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-24 13:27       ` David Marchand
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 03/10] drivers: relax dependency order Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 11:07       ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-24 13:48         ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 13:54           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-24 14:50             ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-24 15:17               ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 15:29                 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-24 13:41       ` David Marchand
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 04/10] common/mlx5: fix void parameters in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 05/10] regex/mlx5: fix segmentation fault during error unwinding Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 06/10] common/mlx5: avoid using class constructor priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 13:45       ` David Marchand
2020-07-24 13:47         ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 07/10] common/mlx5: change class values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 08/10] common/mlx5: introduce layer to support multiple class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:40       ` David Marchand
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/10] common/mlx5: register class drivers through common layer Parav Pandit
2020-07-23 20:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] common/mlx5: remove class check from class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 01/10] eal: introduce macro for bit definition Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 02/10] drivers: fix indent of directory list Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 03/10] drivers: relax dependency order Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 04/10] common/mlx5: fix void parameters in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 05/10] regex/mlx5: fix segmentation fault during error unwinding Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 06/10] common/mlx5: avoid using class constructor priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 07/10] common/mlx5: change class values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 08/10] common/mlx5: introduce layer to support multiple class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/10] common/mlx5: register class drivers through common layer Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 10/10] common/mlx5: remove class check from class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 " Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:38     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 01/10] eal: introduce macro for bit definition Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 18:31       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-27  8:21         ` Morten Brørup
2020-07-27 17:01           ` Parav Pandit
2020-07-28  2:18           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-28  8:24             ` Morten Brørup
2020-07-28  9:29               ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-07-28 11:11                 ` Morten Brørup
2020-07-28 15:39                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-28 15:59                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-24 14:38     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 02/10] drivers: fix indent of directory list Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:38     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 03/10] drivers: relax dependency order Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 04/10] common/mlx5: fix void parameters in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 05/10] regex/mlx5: fix segmentation fault during error unwinding Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 06/10] common/mlx5: avoid using class constructor priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 07/10] common/mlx5: change class values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 08/10] common/mlx5: introduce layer to support multiple class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 09/10] common/mlx5: register class drivers through common layer Parav Pandit
2020-07-24 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 10/10] common/mlx5: remove class check from class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 01/10] eal: introduce macro for bit definition Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 02/10] drivers: fix indent of directory list Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 03/10] drivers: relax dependency order Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 04/10] common/mlx5: fix void parameters in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 05/10] regex/mlx5: fix segmentation fault during error unwinding Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 06/10] common/mlx5: avoid using class constructor priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 07/10] common/mlx5: change class values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 08/10] common/mlx5: introduce layer to support multiple class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 09/10] common/mlx5: register class drivers through common layer Parav Pandit
2020-07-26 14:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 10/10] common/mlx5: remove class check from class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 01/10] eal: introduce macro for bit definition Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 02/10] drivers: fix indent of directory list Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 03/10] drivers: relax dependency order Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 04/10] common/mlx5: fix void parameters in glue wrappers Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 05/10] regex/mlx5: fix segmentation fault during error unwinding Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 06/10] common/mlx5: avoid using class constructor priority Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 07/10] common/mlx5: change class values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 08/10] common/mlx5: introduce layer to support multiple class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 09/10] common/mlx5: register class drivers through common layer Parav Pandit
2020-07-27 17:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 10/10] common/mlx5: remove class check from class drivers Parav Pandit
2020-07-28 17:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] Improve mlx5 PMD driver framework for multiple classes Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-10 17:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/6] common/mlx5: use class enable check helper function Parav Pandit
2020-06-15 19:48   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-10 17:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/6] common/mlx5: change mlx5 class enum values as bits Parav Pandit
2020-06-15 19:55   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-18  9:29     ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-10 17:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/6] bus/mlx5_pci: add mlx5 PCI bus Parav Pandit
2020-06-15 21:00   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-17  8:13     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-18  9:41       ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-18  9:41     ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-10 17:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/6] bus/mlx5_pci: register a PCI driver Parav Pandit
2020-06-15 21:46   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-17  8:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-18  9:47       ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-18 10:03     ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-18 14:35       ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-18 15:52         ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-10 17:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 6/6] bus/mlx5_pci: enable net and vDPA to use mlx5 PCI bus driver Parav Pandit
2020-06-15 21:56   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-06-18 10:06     ` Parav Pandit
2020-06-18 15:13       ` Gaëtan Rivet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200629154957.laaew2777qur5tux@u256.net \
    --to=grive@u256.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=parav@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git