DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Archit Pandey <architpandeynitk@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org,
	Gokul Bargaje <gokulbargaje.182009@nitk.edu.in>,
	"Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>,
	Tarun Anand <anandtarun2@gmail.com>,
	Sanjana Krishnam <sanjanakrishnam@gmail.com>,
	"Avinash ." <avinash.182cs009@nitk.edu.in>,
	Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Queue Management Support in DPDK
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:07:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729120714.67bb46de@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANtWViMLg3ArDhdj8q+VYst1_UHErD1K9CudNBoMTc+4V+Gv8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:07:29 +0530
Archit Pandey <architpandeynitk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> We have been using DPDK's QoS framework over the last year and found
> that rte_sched and the provided qos_sched app work great for QoS.
> 
> However, when we ventured into trying to add CoDel (to replace RED) as
> a dropper to the framework, we faced several challenges due to how
> tightly rte_sched and rte_red were coupled together. As we had no
> success with rte_sched, we would like to propose a new framework for
> queue management in DPDK.
> 
> Goals we have in mind for the framework:
> - Act as an abstraction for queue management algorithms (AQMs) such as
> CoDel, PiE and RED.
> - Make it easy for new algorithms to be added.
> 
> We’d appreciate feedback on whether such a framework would be welcomed
> in the community, or what else could be done for adding queue
> management support.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Archit Pandey.

rte_sched is not a generic AQM mechanism. You will have to write a new
replacement for rte_sched if you want something else.

I would recommend starting with Cake. It is latest and most complete
and the developers are active and friendly.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29 18:37 Archit Pandey
2020-07-29 19:07 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-08-02  9:42   ` Archit Pandey
2020-08-02 16:53     ` Jon Loeliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200729120714.67bb46de@hermes.lan \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=anandtarun2@gmail.com \
    --cc=architpandeynitk@gmail.com \
    --cc=avinash.182cs009@nitk.edu.in \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gokulbargaje.182009@nitk.edu.in \
    --cc=lesliemonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=sanjanakrishnam@gmail.com \
    --cc=tahiliani@nitk.edu.in \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).