From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEE4A04E4; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0102BAA; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com (mail-pj1-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74222B94 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:53:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id mt12so281868pjb.4 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=u9+HgsN/LNThCVOVyTqzaKiorXUBSBnUXqsQMRjKgBI=; b=kutU6UaluPUZIExvsYdTAyfPwVxZkhMyDNB1xnrZiPAL8shMsrPFm5EAlp3AaImgRm gQUWxAfSiZUibNmU/kgzOC1XAM5BsCxabPvxuraxoespKouFZ+py6B5AN2PCyx8WHiV8 gq8ciVp3aodDE1ll7ZO295E0sTzbAYVbnzaW7BOZ47lHAeEmbcUGH7zNCqVR5ZfUI9uT /FbBtIIzMAgRqyc012TvA6O7U6D9fNAqaxDTQYlRT1wrdRrHaCDS+XkGtuKA9OzmHGdx OKS3D8131/A/wG8vkqll97HuwkySVbYooLRWyeASWGqj7IhU2m7O6/3Aytt08yl1edOt 9n7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u9+HgsN/LNThCVOVyTqzaKiorXUBSBnUXqsQMRjKgBI=; b=ROs41Ab2LUDK7ovPqy+ObAui2dboNNP6VXczAY+qjGBf9dJ140kJ5kAIVYZQQyZz0E eIW0/xB+epqRRYKmxYHkBbEhaOkoHzKwbuvAKCayleaMsLBD4kUSt2iMZHLf14iXXCQ5 cf8BREsxHDKEnzCF6SOylrpyT9jrdHVPvTA1l79+y44lykrvnCr/V0gOjNd2XvuBx2x4 DtcuhUhOFMDFZnVXsM6YVzMspSQYY1wUs4Pqsa+8j7Y7E38ipAaIMxVsCmgnLzhJzrZ4 FIITwzl7WCcNmrnLyxIMLwnGvGNYtzNVvyr0dROaEmFx6eDcjNUZzH4+GAWn4djMQeCr iB4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532m/+bZwaT/h8DdnArYyogkVgTQiinozyaJilpS6np6kFj/MV++ LDXrIm8uvFdMYCq+GhM72onwC/3MSzA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw86hrcl/WR5KEbnJOnsmfDrL/WqUxJ9Dct88J37VkFIUBVU15vdYjbQ5HXjYhSnhmYpQ3miQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c111:: with SMTP id 17mr3122088pli.265.1597193582687; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm362149pga.9.2020.08.11.17.53.01 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:52:59 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200811175259.58d8d45b@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200506193741.24117-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200506193741.24117-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] proc-info enhancements X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 6 May 2020 12:37:34 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The current proc-info command is useful for diagnosing issues > with external DPDK applications, but the display is limited > and somewhat ugly. This patchset adds some enhancements which > show more info and suppress unnecessary stuff. > I know 20.08 release was hectic but what happened, this patchset got passed over. That make me sad since it is very useful for diagnosing real issues.