From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C79A04C2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966E11C032; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:25:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com (mail-pf1-f196.google.com [209.85.210.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD151C031 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:25:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id m8so1201212pfh.3 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JXe2psTy5nrduCeNbRZ9FjrCUSlrmwQChxQVKPeJ34o=; b=0VKuPu5xujJIYPjHDQ9r9At1cLkuOUuSj8uAfRR/GPfGVQl8GxSK2vXooNDMMJdvWL D0sp/lc2CBDAw3/E7KyCdggaYOdzZ4krMgwscTSiS965pWox5IQ7AbvcukeAcnlMR551 BYkwiS8YIS54e9Iry1e615+kNSgEj4dJQ+/7drJnAU/pvVw89NM6odMGZ7WKvL1+T8em htgqM6d6cYmhdXWkA/ElV6IXJRup/cSn3rXMjTd5u5xZ1N5q+om9u35gVnONYfF4KvMr bBXTc0R6MP/jVXjKszCKMo6z3De89pVLQdCwMHiDN8EZMwL4yKB0+r1nZMDQO56LXeqC 0CTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JXe2psTy5nrduCeNbRZ9FjrCUSlrmwQChxQVKPeJ34o=; b=tQnhNmsu9EocxoDHdZW/HjQcK70lv7l8M3zJUiHyHiB52xepm6HTygqD+vZT1YmvcW NwWnuk47T1zkM207H2Nn7KAyqp0jZ0EGH0cqQAaCTZhnnpeI44b+cGF6VRvil/te2SNe A8PJqkPvFHRlftXukxXIwUUI8C4TcHoBxuwIhQzH7F0QkN+bKf+44pFFqZUsWcnk0Q1Y cTqb6Wo4bdGVRNANfgAcNd9bGBQDI4VAb4/pxyHquBX6sHXzj3eMzyiwNEpJNjAcSCL1 R734JNxYTr9f16JFU2ihBdN1oq0/f9ylzwOfpaAyj9wqoMElZGIaqMXnhU2nKrflOzwT YN8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MjUJOuSVlMsgeF0MEx9yULa4DMn2Fa6BPEPbl9Zi25q0Nazgf HFlkKC0NKQ/92WH3AmNI2szv6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTX5G2twCWmVpdb+GxcbOQDkPNQ5TR9F2bCQ6L1HbsCeICLUJkJXaCf9Ij3hu1ZkZLk09FNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:91:: with SMTP id c17mr54342pfj.151.1597245938888; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm2892683pfo.132.2020.08.12.08.25.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:25:35 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Maxime Coquelin , Bruce Richardson , "Dybkowski, AdamX" , "Trahe, Fiona" , Hemant Agrawal , dev@dpdk.org, "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "bluca@debian.org" , Akhil Goyal , "Mcnamara, John" , "techboard@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20200812082535.78993680@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <145205346.Q2VnLu3xmU@thomas> References: <20200727094113.2849-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com> <58ac857c-7ec0-4d84-755c-ba81e1e57aac@redhat.com> <145205346.Q2VnLu3xmU@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:23:51 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 12/08/2020 12:57, Hemant Agrawal: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: techboard On Behalf Of Maxime > > > Coquelin > > > > > > On 8/12/20 12:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 12/08/2020 11:52, Bruce Richardson: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > >>> 10/08/2020 13:49, Trahe, Fiona: > > > >>>> Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes > > > >>>> that are recommended and agreed throughout DPDK do you think an > > > >>>> exception can be made and that this change can get into 20.11 even > > > without the deprecation notice being in 20.08? > > > >>> > > > >>> That's a question for techboard. > > > >>> > > > >>> PS: please avoid top-posting > > > >>> > > > >> My initial 2c is that we should allow this, and add the required > > > >> deprecation notice to the online docs immediately. I would assume > > > >> most people use the online docs rather than building their own from > > > >> the package, therefore adding in a deprecation notice to the online > > > >> versions a few days after a release should not be a major problem IMHO. > > > >> > > > >> Also, given the fact that we have once-a-year at most to apply ABI > > > >> changes, and this is the first time we are going this, so I think a > > > >> little latitude should be given! :-) > > > > > > > > I agree > > > > > > > > We need more opinions from other techboard members to make it a > > > decision. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree too, let's give a bit more flexibility for the deprecation notice. > > > > > > Maxime > > > > +1 > > Hemant > > I've applied the patch after 20.11-rc0. I am ok with changing this for 20.11 since there aren't a lot of users of this subsystem and the change should be API compatiable