DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Lariau <steven.lariau@arm.com>
To: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Steven Lariau <steven.lariau@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/stack: avoid trivial memory allocations
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:18:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200812191847.16529-2-steven.lariau@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812191847.16529-1-steven.lariau@arm.com>

Replace the arguments array by one argument.
All objects in the args array have the same values, so there is no need
to use an array, only one struct is enough.
The args object is a lot smaller, and the allocation can be replaced
with a global variable.

The allocation of obj_table isn't needed either, because MAX_BULK is
small. The allocation can instead be replaced with a static array.

Signed-off-by: Steven Lariau <steven.lariau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_stack.c | 53 +++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_stack.c b/app/test/test_stack.c
index c8dac1f55..f64d70c9d 100644
--- a/app/test/test_stack.c
+++ b/app/test/test_stack.c
@@ -276,20 +276,14 @@ struct test_args {
 	rte_atomic64_t *sz;
 };
 
+static struct test_args thread_test_args;
+
 static int
-stack_thread_push_pop(void *args)
+stack_thread_push_pop(__rte_unused void *args)
 {
-	struct test_args *t = args;
-	void **obj_table;
+	void *obj_table[MAX_BULK];
 	int i;
 
-	obj_table = rte_calloc(NULL, STACK_SIZE, sizeof(void *), 0);
-	if (obj_table == NULL) {
-		printf("[%s():%u] failed to calloc %zu bytes\n",
-		       __func__, __LINE__, STACK_SIZE * sizeof(void *));
-		return -1;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_ITERS_PER_THREAD; i++) {
 		unsigned int success, num;
 
@@ -297,41 +291,37 @@ stack_thread_push_pop(void *args)
 		 * then push and pop those stack entries.
 		 */
 		do {
-			uint64_t sz = rte_atomic64_read(t->sz);
+			uint64_t sz = rte_atomic64_read(thread_test_args.sz);
 			volatile uint64_t *sz_addr;
 
-			sz_addr = (volatile uint64_t *)t->sz;
+			sz_addr = (volatile uint64_t *)thread_test_args.sz;
 
 			num = RTE_MIN(rte_rand() % MAX_BULK, STACK_SIZE - sz);
 
 			success = rte_atomic64_cmpset(sz_addr, sz, sz + num);
 		} while (success == 0);
 
-		if (rte_stack_push(t->s, obj_table, num) != num) {
+		if (rte_stack_push(thread_test_args.s, obj_table, num) != num) {
 			printf("[%s():%u] Failed to push %u pointers\n",
 			       __func__, __LINE__, num);
-			rte_free(obj_table);
 			return -1;
 		}
 
-		if (rte_stack_pop(t->s, obj_table, num) != num) {
+		if (rte_stack_pop(thread_test_args.s, obj_table, num) != num) {
 			printf("[%s():%u] Failed to pop %u pointers\n",
 			       __func__, __LINE__, num);
-			rte_free(obj_table);
 			return -1;
 		}
 
-		rte_atomic64_sub(t->sz, num);
+		rte_atomic64_sub(thread_test_args.sz, num);
 	}
 
-	rte_free(obj_table);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int
 test_stack_multithreaded(uint32_t flags)
 {
-	struct test_args *args;
 	unsigned int lcore_id;
 	struct rte_stack *s;
 	rte_atomic64_t size;
@@ -344,45 +334,28 @@ test_stack_multithreaded(uint32_t flags)
 	printf("[%s():%u] Running with %u lcores\n",
 	       __func__, __LINE__, rte_lcore_count());
 
-	args = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(struct test_args) * RTE_MAX_LCORE, 0);
-	if (args == NULL) {
-		printf("[%s():%u] failed to malloc %zu bytes\n",
-		       __func__, __LINE__,
-		       sizeof(struct test_args) * RTE_MAX_LCORE);
-		return -1;
-	}
-
 	s = rte_stack_create("test", STACK_SIZE, rte_socket_id(), flags);
 	if (s == NULL) {
 		printf("[%s():%u] Failed to create a stack\n",
 		       __func__, __LINE__);
-		rte_free(args);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
 	rte_atomic64_init(&size);
+	thread_test_args.s = s;
+	thread_test_args.sz = &size;
 
 	RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(lcore_id) {
-		args[lcore_id].s = s;
-		args[lcore_id].sz = &size;
-
 		if (rte_eal_remote_launch(stack_thread_push_pop,
-					  &args[lcore_id], lcore_id))
+					  NULL, lcore_id))
 			rte_panic("Failed to launch lcore %d\n", lcore_id);
 	}
 
-	lcore_id = rte_lcore_id();
-
-	args[lcore_id].s = s;
-	args[lcore_id].sz = &size;
-
-	stack_thread_push_pop(&args[lcore_id]);
+	stack_thread_push_pop(NULL);
 
 	rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
 
 	rte_stack_free(s);
-	rte_free(args);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-05 15:57 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] test/stack: improve multithreaded test Steven Lariau
2020-08-05 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/stack: avoid trivial memory allocations Steven Lariau
2020-08-11 20:13   ` Eads, Gage
2020-08-11 20:38     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-11 20:49       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-11 21:14         ` Eads, Gage
2020-08-05 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test/stack: launch tests with mp remote launch API Steven Lariau
2020-08-11 20:13   ` Eads, Gage
2020-08-05 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] test/stack: propagate errors to main core Steven Lariau
2020-08-11 20:13   ` Eads, Gage
2020-08-05 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/stack: remove atomics operations Steven Lariau
2020-08-11 20:13   ` Eads, Gage
2020-08-12 19:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] test/stack: improve multithreaded test Steven Lariau
2020-08-12 19:18   ` Steven Lariau [this message]
2020-08-13 21:38     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/stack: avoid trivial memory allocations Eads, Gage
2020-08-12 19:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/stack: launch tests with mp remote launch API Steven Lariau
2020-08-12 19:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/stack: propagate errors to main core Steven Lariau
2020-08-12 19:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/stack: remove atomics operations Steven Lariau
2020-09-30 19:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] test/stack: improve multithreaded test David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200812191847.16529-2-steven.lariau@arm.com \
    --to=steven.lariau@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).