From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064A8A04AB; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:59:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DED01C07B; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63314137D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:59:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1598860780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/PumXOUXcLnbbCMjst5SpkBTdjHfmqymlhscwlOiZTo=; b=cYHsjmvF/Pae6I1E7sEq9q/qIhJeTHoEZYFEhfVlo08NUxrh3wvnaValI/34Qstolg1Ltx ROZ4N/hBdiOgzXxpFQi1ra4cC/H7pWn4uOaLedi0FKpx+ApID5DUt3WFGSvmiFnsf83Oiq oYYOSJwvGtHLOy37X5t7oXD2Hk/PoxE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-63-gbJJir7lO1mQPa0rI37AVg-1; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 03:59:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gbJJir7lO1mQPa0rI37AVg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56EC1084C8F; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eperezma.remote.csb (ovpn-112-229.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DC05D9DC; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:59:25 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Eugenio=20P=C3=A9rez?= To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Adrian Moreno Zapata , Chenbo Xia , Zhihong Wang , Jens Freimann , stable@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin , Kevin Traynor Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:59:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20200831075922.17970-1-eperezma@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200810141103.8015-1-eperezma@redhat.com> References: <20200810141103.8015-1-eperezma@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eperezma@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] vhost: Make iotlb mempool not single-consumer X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Bugzilla bug: 523 This behavior is only observed on packed vq + virtio-net kernel driver in the guest, so we could make the single-consumer flag optional. However, I have not found why I cannot see the issue in split, so the safer option is to never set it. Any comments? Thanks! v2: Modify commit message to not to include all trace and commands. Eugenio Pérez (1): vhost: fix iotlb mempool single-consumer flag lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.18.1