From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
phil.yang@arm.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] eal/pause: remove experimental tag from wait until equal
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:45:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911054534.55378-5-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200911054534.55378-1-joyce.kong@arm.com>
rte_wait_until_equal_xx APIs were introduced in 19.11 release
and there were no changes in the public APIs since then, it
should be mature enough to remove the experimental tag.
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h b/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h
index 7422785f1..668ee4a18 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h
@@ -28,9 +28,6 @@
static inline void rte_pause(void);
/**
- * @warning
- * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed, without prior notice
- *
* Wait for *addr to be updated with a 16-bit expected value, with a relaxed
* memory ordering model meaning the loads around this API can be reordered.
*
@@ -44,15 +41,11 @@ static inline void rte_pause(void);
* C++11 memory orders with the same names, see the C++11 standard or
* the GCC wiki on atomic synchronization for detailed definition.
*/
-__rte_experimental
static __rte_always_inline void
rte_wait_until_equal_16(volatile uint16_t *addr, uint16_t expected,
int memorder);
/**
- * @warning
- * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed, without prior notice
- *
* Wait for *addr to be updated with a 32-bit expected value, with a relaxed
* memory ordering model meaning the loads around this API can be reordered.
*
@@ -66,15 +59,11 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_16(volatile uint16_t *addr, uint16_t expected,
* C++11 memory orders with the same names, see the C++11 standard or
* the GCC wiki on atomic synchronization for detailed definition.
*/
-__rte_experimental
static __rte_always_inline void
rte_wait_until_equal_32(volatile uint32_t *addr, uint32_t expected,
int memorder);
/**
- * @warning
- * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed, without prior notice
- *
* Wait for *addr to be updated with a 64-bit expected value, with a relaxed
* memory ordering model meaning the loads around this API can be reordered.
*
@@ -88,7 +77,6 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_32(volatile uint32_t *addr, uint32_t expected,
* C++11 memory orders with the same names, see the C++11 standard or
* the GCC wiki on atomic synchronization for detailed definition.
*/
-__rte_experimental
static __rte_always_inline void
rte_wait_until_equal_64(volatile uint64_t *addr, uint64_t expected,
int memorder);
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-11 5:45 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] remove experimental tags from APIs Joyce Kong
2020-09-11 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] eal/ticketlock: remove experimental tag Joyce Kong
2020-09-11 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] eal/mcslock: " Joyce Kong
2020-09-11 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] rcu: remove experimental tag from QSBR mechanism Joyce Kong
2020-10-05 8:54 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-09-11 5:45 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2021-07-07 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] eal/pause: remove experimental tag from wait until equal Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-16 17:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] remove experimental tags from APIs David Marchand
2020-09-25 14:12 ` David Marchand
2020-09-25 14:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-05 19:39 ` David Christensen
2020-10-05 8:39 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-10-05 12:18 ` David Marchand
2020-10-06 8:30 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200911054534.55378-5-joyce.kong@arm.com \
--to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).