DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:27:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915062749.21374-7-feifei.wang2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915062749.21374-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>

Do code clean up by moving repeated code inside 'test_ring_mem_cmp'
function to validate data and print information of enqueue/dequeue
elements if validation fails.

Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_ring.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_ring.c b/app/test/test_ring.c
index da57032c7..fb46614f8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ring.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ring.c
@@ -258,6 +258,21 @@ test_ring_mem_init(void *obj, unsigned int count, int esize)
 			((uint32_t *)obj)[i] = i;
 }
 
+static int
+test_ring_mem_cmp(void *src, void *dst, unsigned int size)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = memcmp(src, dst, size);
+	if (ret) {
+		rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, size);
+		rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, size);
+		printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void
 test_ring_print_test_string(const char *istr, unsigned int api_type, int esize)
 {
@@ -383,7 +398,7 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests1(unsigned int test_idx)
 	struct rte_ring *r;
 	void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int i, j;
+	unsigned int i, j, temp_sz;
 	int rand;
 	const unsigned int rsz = RING_SIZE - 1;
 
@@ -444,12 +459,11 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests1(unsigned int test_idx)
 			TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(r));
 
 			/* check data */
-			if (esize[i] == -1) {
-				TEST_RING_VERIFY(memcmp(src, dst,
-					rsz * sizeof(void *)) == 0);
-			} else
-				TEST_RING_VERIFY(memcmp(src, dst,
-					rsz * esize[i]) == 0);
+			temp_sz = rsz * sizeof(void *);
+			if (esize[i] != -1)
+				temp_sz = rsz * esize[i];
+			TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
+						temp_sz) == 0);
 		}
 
 		/* Free memory before test completed */
@@ -543,14 +557,8 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests2(unsigned int test_idx)
 		cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], MAX_BULK);
 
 		/* check data */
-		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src,
-					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst,
-					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
-			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+		if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
 			goto fail;
-		}
 
 		/* Free memory before test completed */
 		rte_ring_free(r);
@@ -621,14 +629,8 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests3(unsigned int test_idx)
 		}
 
 		/* check data */
-		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src,
-					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst,
-					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
-			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+		if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
 			goto fail;
-		}
 
 		/* Free memory before test completed */
 		rte_ring_free(r);
@@ -756,14 +758,8 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests4(unsigned int test_idx)
 			goto fail;
 
 		/* check data */
-		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src,
-					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst,
-					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
-			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+		if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
 			goto fail;
-		}
 
 		/* Free memory before test completed */
 		rte_ring_free(r);
@@ -868,12 +864,8 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
 		}
 
 		/* check data */
-		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
-			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+		if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
 			goto fail_test;
-		}
 
 		/* Following tests use the configured flags to decide
 		 * SP/SC or MP/MC.
@@ -920,12 +912,8 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
 		cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
 
 		/* check data */
-		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
-			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+		if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
 			goto fail_test;
-		}
 
 		rte_ring_free(rp);
 		rte_free(src);
@@ -1058,12 +1046,8 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
 		}
 
 		/* check data */
-		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
-			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
-			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
+		if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
 			goto test_fail;
-		}
 
 		rte_free(src_orig);
 		rte_free(dst_orig);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29  6:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] wrong pointer passed of ring Feifei Wang
2020-07-29  6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] ring: fix the misdescription of the param Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 15:59   ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 16:24     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-29 19:34       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31  5:26       ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-29  6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] test/ring: fix wrong param passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 13:48   ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 14:16     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 14:21       ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2020-07-29 15:03         ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 21:24           ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:28             ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31  6:25               ` Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] wrong pointer passed and add check Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27  9:05       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/ring: fix the wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27  8:54       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/ring: add check to validate the dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:50     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27  8:47       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:26     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:28     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:29     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:37     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-14  9:20       ` David Marchand
2020-09-11 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-17 16:26     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-20 11:54       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 15:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-23  9:24   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200915062749.21374-7-feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).