From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7962A04C7;
	Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:45:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AF21D8D8;
	Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:45:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE621D8D3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:45:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
 by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03EA11D4;
 Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from net-arm-thunderx2-02.shanghai.arm.com
 (net-arm-thunderx2-02.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.210.116])
 by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 808913F68F;
 Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com,
 honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:45:17 +0800
Message-Id: <20200918054518.208990-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto/armv8: remove crypto enum list end
	references
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Removed references to RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_LIST_END and
RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END.

Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
---
This is follow up of cryptodev change:
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/76330/
 drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h | 6 ++----
 drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c     | 9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h b/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
index 66b03fb92..75ddba79c 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
@@ -70,11 +70,9 @@ enum armv8_crypto_auth_mode {
 	ARMV8_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END = ARMV8_CRYPTO_AUTH_NOT_SUPPORTED
 };
 
-#define CRYPTO_ORDER_MAX		ARMV8_CRYPTO_CHAIN_LIST_END
-#define CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_MAX		ARMV8_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_LIST_END
 #define CRYPTO_CIPHER_KEYLEN_MAX	ARMV8_CRYPTO_CIPHER_KEYLEN_LIST_END
-#define CRYPTO_CIPHER_MAX		RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_LIST_END
-#define CRYPTO_AUTH_MAX			RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END
+#define CRYPTO_CIPHER_MAX		(RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_ECB + 1)
+#define CRYPTO_AUTH_MAX			(RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SHA512_HMAC + 1)
 
 #define HMAC_IPAD_VALUE			(0x36)
 #define HMAC_OPAD_VALUE			(0x5C)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c b/drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c
index c95729db5..c3db711b7 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c
@@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ crypto_chain_order[] = {
 	crypto_func_tbl_t *func_tbl =					\
 				(crypto_chain_order[(order)])[(cop)];	\
 									\
-	((*func_tbl)[(calg)][(aalg)][KEYL(keyl)]);		\
+	((calg >= CRYPTO_CIPHER_MAX) || (aalg >= CRYPTO_AUTH_MAX)) ?	\
+		NULL : ((*func_tbl)[(calg)][(aalg)][KEYL(keyl)]);	\
 })
 
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -188,7 +189,8 @@ crypto_key_sched_dir[] = {
 ({									\
 	crypto_key_sched_tbl_t *ks_tbl = crypto_key_sched_dir[(cop)];	\
 									\
-	((*ks_tbl)[(calg)][KEYL(keyl)]);				\
+	(calg >= CRYPTO_CIPHER_MAX) ?					\
+		NULL : ((*ks_tbl)[(calg)][KEYL(keyl)]);			\
 })
 
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -436,7 +438,8 @@ armv8_crypto_set_session_chained_parameters(struct armv8_crypto_session *sess,
 		return -ENOTSUP;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(sess->crypto_func == NULL)) {
+	if (unlikely(sess->crypto_func == NULL ||
+		sess->cipher.key_sched == NULL)) {
 		/*
 		 * If we got here that means that there must be a bug
 		 * in the algorithms selection above. Nevertheless keep
-- 
2.17.1