From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A381A04C0; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:13:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3705B1E960; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:13:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f68.google.com (mail-pj1-f68.google.com [209.85.216.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F49A1D41D for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:13:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f68.google.com with SMTP id md22so1572933pjb.0 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:13:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=opbwAYZTodoH65rT3ZO1k002W8dTIUWuGCqbYoKE8dM=; b=1lOudALjQ6tIurUEvkv/j2i555Es+wJfwcMDzg6ZS1+PRx5U/3sluPfjB6w1RYfOia 1tY8tVRs/QLSC5D+B+k/kA4DotuaSZCougpPtwHChU4blSEOSG6sZm5wuyOiqcunwqVH jjlhBFPqhl9rq5Ph2esFVfX1cOq9MKuDFHOHkccwKgunox8BgtZYD94Yea4wxSsb7btq Rtl57KURXASOg2rB7MWbOFOQL6YhMpTEG38Zhi4HZAAqXLEAWaj8LZqCqh2zvJFfpLGs oayvvJIS12trfQhFShhG62J9nwpxhtV6kT0m/1wnZHz48SK5ZcoAxKsnO6iUQvxG0iFl Jftw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=opbwAYZTodoH65rT3ZO1k002W8dTIUWuGCqbYoKE8dM=; b=MbEa2bkkC6kGmP54O/ytz1TWdzKVToS8+e0QaL/2EPVyOgPV0VYqIN6cBVzkAH4J2y PuSjo3d0G9pixmeTi5mQmvLXB3bTKa0b1sZ9HageAkk5hbU2NG5qyl1olQXpZiGI6xoG h0l3PBvIbcPdVQme3gHAozYebDtYvRRxcLP+v/oac0I9ujdhtQNT8WQT3siGJzWX9hzs 11eDZr5GekbkaktkElGuFnDqw+WGXc9B4wzIlivk/A0and3rCM8S074wQpVZFa7t6X85 Wk1xdvQ0Gvn0mNaFSLxFxmwya4iC65Ax5ZDPnWH3iQOdu0YLYE7+oqkFWaPZ/8D4fURz GelQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QBnBMdJpu5X2L3PVD3mvPBbkmy0GVyHWoMZC4D1bG7oLCunDO gFCZhSHvTtODe86fHoWTCLJXMw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyW7K5mI6nIaHqnccnQClnIsKAdREVVLj79ytZ2q0cTvxam6fvEc2ZIQsFzH3OfgUKiVz9OBg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a016:: with SMTP id q22mr490701pjp.99.1601053993674; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20sm3030665pfh.146.2020.09.25.10.13.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:13:05 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: David Marchand Cc: dev Message-ID: <20200925101305.0f5f1040@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20200925161345.23209-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] checkpatch: suppress fallthrough warning X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:41:40 +0200 David Marchand wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 6:14 PM Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > The DPDK does not have (or want to use) the same fallthrough > > wrapper as the Linux kernel. Therefore silence the warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Never mind; note to self look first... Didn't see that it was already set. Maybe the issue is that the scans from patchwork are still using older version of the DPDK script? Did a dummy patch just now with main branch and dpdk-checkpatch is correctly suppressing the warning. But recent patches submitted to mailing list are getting checkpatch warnings.