From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C24A04DB; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:16:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A061EC75; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C991EC69 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:16:24 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: COP9V0P/+emrzJTMMvX4XHJ4evzHRGH0nR52CbD5M5nEVN3vs4hxLxUNVvYyHI4JAUkXUUx1TZ jdhrdYIGKKQg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9775"; a="163102769" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,382,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="163102769" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2020 03:16:24 -0700 IronPort-SDR: nPk+Ksu0JThjr6LsGFP2gpuddVnv9JxHtEU5+euL2sp6yqyd+ZKPTxc9sZ56N5nuAbsOJPymmQ UArHPyABbgrA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,382,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="531662779" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.54.208]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Oct 2020 03:16:21 -0700 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:16:17 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> To: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, viktorin@rehivetech.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com> Message-ID: <20201016101617.GE1008@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200807155859.63888-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20201016081320.186775-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20201016081320.186775-9-ciara.power@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201016081320.186775-9-ciara.power@intel.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 08/18] net/iavf: add checks for max SIMD bitwidth X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:13:10AM +0100, Ciara Power wrote: > When choosing a vector path to take, an extra condition must be > satisfied to ensure the max SIMD bitwidth allows for the CPU enabled > path. > > Cc: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com> > Cc: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com> > LGTM Reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>