DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Ma Lihong <lihongx.ma@intel.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow overriding of build-time constants
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:55:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016155558.GB1121@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zP0+Ge5JE+N_8TwVxoPwXBJWcJBtshToqh-=NicAp+yw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 05:47:45PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Bruce,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:50 PM Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > A number of the more advanced DPDK build settings which are not expected to
> > be user modified are stored in config/rte_config.h. In some cases, for a
> > custom build a user may want to override those settings via CFLAGS, so we
> > need to ensure that the definitions do not override the user-provided
> > values.
> >
> > Bruce Richardson (3):
> >   config: remove explicit undefinition of unset values
> >   config: allow overriding some build defaults
> >   doc: add notes on overriding extra config values
> 
> $ CFLAGS="-DRTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS=64" meson setup
> --default-library=shared --buildtype=debugoptimized
> -Dprefix=/home/dmarchan/git/pub/dpdk.org/build/install build
> $ ninja-build -C build -j4 install
> 
> 
> librte_eal.so is indeed built with the 64 value:
> $ pahole -C rte_mem_config build/install/lib64/librte_eal.so |grep memsegs
> die__process_function: tag not supported (INVALID)!
>     struct rte_memseg_list     memsegs[64];          /*   136  8704 */
> 
> 
> But no trace of the custom value for external applications:
> $ grep -r RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS build/install
> build/install/include/rte_config.h:#ifndef RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS
> build/install/include/rte_config.h:#define RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS 128
> Binary file build/install/lib64/librte_eal.a matches
> Binary file build/install/lib64/librte_eal.so.21.0 matches
> 
> I can see the same using the meson option -Dc_args.
> 

Good point, I had not thought of external apps using these values.

They are mostly for internal use, so maybe its worthwhile looking to not
have them in a public header file. What do you think? Is it likely that
apps would be using some of these values, or needs to know the specifics?

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-16 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-25 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config: remove explicit undefinition of unset values Bruce Richardson
2020-08-25 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] config: allow overriding some build defaults Bruce Richardson
2020-09-01  5:17   ` Ma, LihongX
2020-09-01  6:07     ` Hemant Agrawal
2020-09-01  9:02       ` Bruce Richardson
2020-09-03 14:50       ` Bruce Richardson
2020-09-03 14:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow overriding of build-time constants Bruce Richardson
2020-09-03 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] config: remove explicit undefinition of unset values Bruce Richardson
2020-09-03 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] config: allow overriding some build defaults Bruce Richardson
2020-09-03 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] doc: add notes on overriding extra config values Bruce Richardson
2020-09-03 15:43     ` Hemant Agrawal
2020-10-14 14:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow overriding of build-time constants Bruce Richardson
2020-10-15  8:55     ` Chen, BoX C
2020-10-15  9:20       ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-16 15:47   ` David Marchand
2020-10-16 15:55     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2020-10-16 16:46       ` David Marchand
2020-10-19 10:21         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-19 21:04           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-20  8:34             ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-20 10:04               ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-20 10:15                 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-28 16:32   ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201016155558.GB1121@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=lihongx.ma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).