From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: allow dynamic flags to be used by secondary process
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:58:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020205805.24311-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201015172019.3181-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
The dynamic flag management is broken if rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup()
is done in a secondary process because the local pointer to
the memzone is not ever initialized.
Fix it by using the same checks as dynfield_register().
I.e if shared memory zone has not been looked up already,
then discover it.
Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
v2 - move check to inside locked region
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
index 538a43f6959f..717898c0df02 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
@@ -185,13 +185,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name, struct rte_mbuf_dynfield *params)
{
struct mbuf_dynfield_elt *mbuf_dynfield;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynfield = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
@@ -384,13 +382,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup(const char *name,
{
struct mbuf_dynflag_elt *mbuf_dynflag;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynflag = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
if (mbuf_dynflag == NULL) {
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-15 17:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-20 12:18 ` Olivier Matz
2020-10-20 20:58 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-10-24 0:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from " Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-26 10:39 ` Olivier Matz
2020-10-26 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-03 21:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-04 5:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] mbuf: allow dynamic flags to be used by " Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-04 8:17 ` Olivier Matz
2020-11-04 16:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-04 16:26 ` Olivier Matz
2020-11-04 17:41 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201020205805.24311-1-stephen@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).