From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D68A04DD; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:26:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6AAA92F; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:26:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37ABE72F9; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:26:04 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: ubAoJPoBRcvJps7sj7etM4CtemCWr2IovoE+CDsWZdKZitA067U4n5GEP34XlT/xKrqoOOy8Tr TuZqBhXFq5NQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9781"; a="229121812" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,404,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="229121812" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2020 01:26:02 -0700 IronPort-SDR: fzJIZdt0zJXyV0N1Yo/oJvl+ROVvfJrHuRIhHExGI7pYw9sVVKpXBs+nW7pFhkK0atPRGigq5U 12EGUE8NeS2Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,404,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="533871138" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.214.249.80]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Oct 2020 01:25:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:25:52 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20201022082552.GE83@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20201022080143.20371-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201022080143.20371-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc/guides: fix reference to x32 architecture X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:01:43AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > There is no CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64_32. > The original intention was probably to refer to x32. > > Fixes: 36032e46be40 ("doc: add coding style") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > --- > doc/guides/contributing/design.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst > index 5fe7f63942..54dad08846 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Per Architecture Sources > The following config options can be used: > > * ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH`` is a string that contains the name of the architecture. > -* ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_I686``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64_32`` or ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_PPC_64`` are defined only if we are building for those architectures. > +* ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_I686``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_X32`` or ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_PPC_64`` are defined only if we are building for those architectures. > With make gone, I don't believe that there is an RTE_ARCH_X86_X32 now either.