From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AECA04DD; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:35:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E849CAC7; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:35:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E75CAC4 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:35:12 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: gB5Zl1dgyRU/k6livKWD2sNVtVkYOvZLC9pL5ds1RVyYM6F6nAq0AsJw1dvimQAKIHJm2GYt36 VnP0ntTXV4vQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9787"; a="232438098" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,426,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="232438098" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2020 06:35:12 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 9JciPndxMf89dBNnulUCpoHti71BXSG22gKi66QxQnYX9tU/6TYzzJzx4L/ZyMevCH+ZM4HlSS 4mFByRjBzS9Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,426,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="394826054" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2020 06:35:08 -0700 Received: from sivswdev09.ir.intel.com (sivswdev09.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.48]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id 09SDZ7Ku031149; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:35:07 GMT Received: from sivswdev09.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev09.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id 09SDZ7AX023466; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:35:07 GMT Received: (from lma25@localhost) by sivswdev09.ir.intel.com with LOCAL id 09SDZ7wf023458; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:35:07 GMT Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:35:07 +0000 From: "Liang, Ma" To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, haiyue.wang@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, david.hunt@intel.com, jerinjacobk@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com, gage.eads@intel.com, mw@semihalf.com, gtzalik@amazon.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, hkalra@marvell.com, johndale@cisco.com, xavier.huwei@huawei.com, xuanziyang2@huawei.com, matan@nvidia.com, yongwang@vmware.com Message-ID: <20201028133507.GC29706@sivswdev09.ir.intel.com> References: <1603494392-7181-1-git-send-email-liang.j.ma@intel.com> <1603810749-22285-1-git-send-email-liang.j.ma@intel.com> <801908397.oWIqQqb9dp@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <801908397.oWIqQqb9dp@thomas> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/9] Add PMD power mgmt X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, I think I addressed all of the questions in relation to V9. I don't think I can solve the issue of a generic API on my own. From the Community Call last week Jerin also said that a generic was investigated but that a single solution wasn't feasible. This API is experimental and other vendor support can be added as needed. If there are any other open issue let me know? Regards Liang On 27 Oct 17:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Please be more patient. > I asked some questions on v9 (ethdev API is not generic enough), > and you send a v10 in the same minute you reply, > without making sure I agree with your answers. > > >