From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD553A04B5; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:37:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67518D0F0; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:37:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D218CCE0; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:37:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC5613D5; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (2p2660v4-1.austin.arm.com [10.118.13.220]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C62E53F66E; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:37:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Dharmik Thakkar To: Bruce Richardson , Vladimir Medvedkin , Gavin Hu , Ruifeng Wang , Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Dharmik Thakkar , stable@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:36:32 -0500 Message-Id: <20201029153634.10647-2-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20201029153634.10647-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> References: <20201029153634.10647-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure in rcu qsbr perf X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Return error if Add/Delete fail in multiwriter perf test Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests") Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang --- app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c index 0a2d76a983c3..251ea12345ae 100644 --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c @@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg) next_hop_add) != 0) { printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n", i, j); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex); + return -1; } pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex); } @@ -464,6 +466,8 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg) large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) { printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route# %d\n", i, j); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex); + return -1; } pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex); } -- 2.17.1