From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133F1A04E6; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:48:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7482668C0; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:45:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D52593A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:45:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909A55C0221; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:45:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:45:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=ZFwkqnbsSvl5x KbM7SjmZejNOt0jMYWYHsRuYeaaTVE=; b=nPhDvlHC7aWfjiFgNh28WckiT1CIt p+B2soFs4zRRpHe+klOSVz6sUu5TjgSNP+/CGOaJ15jnEcGF9yAKp0L2TM6Gcgj9 YmTG9rgTz5CYBZ3yKnmsxHkgj73bgeWXPRNXB5112ZaUZxTuF7vqrE391E7MLX9K F/OYB//L9BlCHyvQiMYb8JJyK7cZ2YuSXR11/ucE3pbplheF5uM1emvWbV0EL8JV +RD+29W5elSGIkp9cBzSC/A9hLwX7E/H2nun6Ocwtn4E2IJSvXr6mlUF872ktgoV T+VAq0dlvuJ3/PwYSYb6CeqFfv+YucMEFIDvOgvD6xGIMi8uQKEJ8Qs1w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=ZFwkqnbsSvl5xKbM7SjmZejNOt0jMYWYHsRuYeaaTVE=; b=rN0DFGzr ldgreSXspvf7JUHm06Qz+sX5UBeIGcv6sviK0fYpnaTD2ThJdfu+5hS7gAfEEMLk 0niDCcRZHXq1R5aQlhmRE15bQWN7uP5hhmEzzWyEwokd3O9KQSW6vC/8I/9lKtFl QOKvXyqP8XPVIQag/FkPMUCzQTYlxf+q1fkhKhi9RhHr1OdkiFDNzkl910zKLFWT ynLZhVyETggECUffJxS9qlsqnGyanjOyZ77YjACsA7i331uflx1u3bkj1KXqpYKw AsUXRryopgBnllYIfoP4AXc55DPqhqKWUgxKcSaG9KFtH0mbeoXv+JOtpYdD/zUo U3l68WS4ONvJig== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrleehgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedvhefgiedvjeegtdevheefhfetleefgfeivefgffevfeejgedtgfeu tdehtdegveenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgepieenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.monjalon.net (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 49C7D3064680; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:45:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, akhil.goyal@nxp.com, jerinj@marvell.com, Kiran Kumar K , Nithin Dabilpuram Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:44:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20201030174441.1076264-12-thomas@monjalon.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201030174441.1076264-1-thomas@monjalon.net> References: <20201026052105.1561859-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201030174441.1076264-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/15] test/graph: switch user data to dynamic mbuf field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The test used the deprecated mbuf field udata64. It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64. Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon --- app/test/test_graph.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_graph.c b/app/test/test_graph.c index ed69eda997..81bdcb9bea 100644 --- a/app/test/test_graph.c +++ b/app/test/test_graph.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include "test.h" @@ -39,6 +40,16 @@ static uint16_t test_node3_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, #define MBUFF_SIZE 512 #define MAX_NODES 4 +typedef uint64_t graph_dynfield_t; +static int graph_dynfield_offset = -1; + +static inline graph_dynfield_t * +graph_field(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf) +{ + return RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD(mbuf, \ + graph_dynfield_offset, graph_dynfield_t *); +} + static struct rte_mbuf mbuf[MAX_NODES + 1][MBUFF_SIZE]; static void *mbuf_p[MAX_NODES + 1][MBUFF_SIZE]; static rte_graph_t graph_id; @@ -162,9 +173,9 @@ test_node_worker_source(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, next_stream = rte_node_next_stream_get(graph, node, next, obj_node0); for (i = 0; i < obj_node0; i++) { data = &mbuf[0][i]; - data->udata64 = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[0].idx << 32) | i; + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[0].idx << 32) | i; if ((i + 1) == obj_node0) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); next_stream[i] = &mbuf[0][i]; } rte_node_next_stream_put(graph, node, next, obj_node0); @@ -175,9 +186,9 @@ test_node_worker_source(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, next_stream = rte_node_next_stream_get(graph, node, next, obj_node1); for (i = 0; i < obj_node1; i++) { data = &mbuf[0][obj_node0 + i]; - data->udata64 = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[1].idx << 32) | i; + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[1].idx << 32) | i; if ((i + 1) == obj_node1) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); next_stream[i] = &mbuf[0][obj_node0 + i]; } @@ -205,23 +216,23 @@ test_node0_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, for (i = 0; i < nb_objs; i++) { data = (struct rte_mbuf *)objs[i]; - if ((data->udata64 >> 32) != tm->test_node[0].idx) { + if ((*graph_field(data) >> 32) != tm->test_node[0].idx) { printf("Data idx miss match at node 0, expected" " = %u got = %u\n", tm->test_node[0].idx, - (uint32_t)(data->udata64 >> 32)); + (uint32_t)(*graph_field(data) >> 32)); goto end; } - if ((data->udata64 & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { + if ((*graph_field(data) & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { printf("Expected buff count miss match at " "node 0\n"); goto end; } - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 16)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 16)) count = i + 1; - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 17)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 17)) second_pass = 1; } @@ -233,12 +244,12 @@ test_node0_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, obj_node0 = nb_objs * obj_node0 * 0.01; for (i = 0; i < obj_node0; i++) { data = &mbuf[1][i]; - data->udata64 = + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[1].idx << 32) | i; if ((i + 1) == obj_node0) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); if (second_pass) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 17); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 17); } rte_node_enqueue(graph, node, 0, (void **)&mbuf_p[1][0], obj_node0); @@ -246,12 +257,12 @@ test_node0_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, obj_node1 = nb_objs - obj_node0; for (i = 0; i < obj_node1; i++) { data = &mbuf[1][obj_node0 + i]; - data->udata64 = + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[2].idx << 32) | i; if ((i + 1) == obj_node1) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); if (second_pass) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 17); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 17); } rte_node_enqueue(graph, node, 1, (void **)&mbuf_p[1][obj_node0], obj_node1); @@ -285,22 +296,22 @@ test_node1_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, fn_calls[2] += 1; for (i = 0; i < nb_objs; i++) { data = (struct rte_mbuf *)objs[i]; - if ((data->udata64 >> 32) != tm->test_node[1].idx) { + if ((*graph_field(data) >> 32) != tm->test_node[1].idx) { printf("Data idx miss match at node 1, expected = %u" " got = %u\n", tm->test_node[1].idx, - (uint32_t)(data->udata64 >> 32)); + (uint32_t)(*graph_field(data) >> 32)); goto end; } - if ((data->udata64 & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { + if ((*graph_field(data) & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { printf("Expected buff count miss match at node 1\n"); goto end; } - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 16)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 16)) count = i + 1; - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 17)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 17)) second_pass = 1; } @@ -312,11 +323,11 @@ test_node1_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, obj_node0 = nb_objs; for (i = 0; i < obj_node0; i++) { data = &mbuf[2][i]; - data->udata64 = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[2].idx << 32) | i; + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[2].idx << 32) | i; if ((i + 1) == obj_node0) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); if (second_pass) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 17); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 17); } rte_node_enqueue(graph, node, 0, (void **)&mbuf_p[2][0], obj_node0); @@ -339,22 +350,22 @@ test_node2_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, fn_calls[3] += 1; for (i = 0; i < nb_objs; i++) { data = (struct rte_mbuf *)objs[i]; - if ((data->udata64 >> 32) != tm->test_node[2].idx) { + if ((*graph_field(data) >> 32) != tm->test_node[2].idx) { printf("Data idx miss match at node 2, expected = %u" " got = %u\n", tm->test_node[2].idx, - (uint32_t)(data->udata64 >> 32)); + (uint32_t)(*graph_field(data) >> 32)); goto end; } - if ((data->udata64 & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { + if ((*graph_field(data) & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { printf("Expected buff count miss match at node 2\n"); goto end; } - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 16)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 16)) count = i + 1; - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 17)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 17)) second_pass = 1; } @@ -367,10 +378,10 @@ test_node2_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, obj_node0 = nb_objs; for (i = 0; i < obj_node0; i++) { data = &mbuf[3][i]; - data->udata64 = + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[3].idx << 32) | i; if ((i + 1) == obj_node0) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); } rte_node_enqueue(graph, node, 0, (void **)&mbuf_p[3][0], obj_node0); @@ -395,22 +406,22 @@ test_node3_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, fn_calls[4] += 1; for (i = 0; i < nb_objs; i++) { data = (struct rte_mbuf *)objs[i]; - if ((data->udata64 >> 32) != tm->test_node[3].idx) { + if ((*graph_field(data) >> 32) != tm->test_node[3].idx) { printf("Data idx miss match at node 3, expected = %u" " got = %u\n", tm->test_node[3].idx, - (uint32_t)(data->udata64 >> 32)); + (uint32_t)(*graph_field(data) >> 32)); goto end; } - if ((data->udata64 & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { + if ((*graph_field(data) & 0xffff) != (i - count)) { printf("Expected buff count miss match at node 3\n"); goto end; } - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 16)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 16)) count = i + 1; - if (data->udata64 & (0x1 << 17)) + if (*graph_field(data) & (0x1 << 17)) second_pass = 1; } @@ -426,11 +437,11 @@ test_node3_worker(struct rte_graph *graph, struct rte_node *node, void **objs, obj_node0 = nb_objs * 2; for (i = 0; i < obj_node0; i++) { data = &mbuf[4][i]; - data->udata64 = + *graph_field(data) = ((uint64_t)tm->test_node[0].idx << 32) | i; - data->udata64 |= (1 << 17); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 17); if ((i + 1) == obj_node0) - data->udata64 |= (1 << 16); + *graph_field(data) |= (1 << 16); } rte_node_enqueue(graph, node, 0, (void **)&mbuf_p[4][0], obj_node0); @@ -765,6 +776,18 @@ graph_setup(void) { int i, j; + static const struct rte_mbuf_dynfield graph_dynfield_desc = { + .name = "test_graph_dynfield", + .size = sizeof(graph_dynfield_t), + .align = __alignof__(graph_dynfield_t), + }; + graph_dynfield_offset = + rte_mbuf_dynfield_register(&graph_dynfield_desc); + if (graph_dynfield_offset < 0) { + printf("Cannot register mbuf field\n"); + return TEST_FAILED; + } + for (i = 0; i <= MAX_NODES; i++) { for (j = 0; j < MBUFF_SIZE; j++) mbuf_p[i][j] = &mbuf[i][j]; -- 2.28.0