DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>, Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mcslock: remove unneeded per-lcore copy
Date: Wed,  4 Nov 2020 18:04:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201104170425.8882-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> (raw)

Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its
stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore
mcslock.

Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test")

Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
 app/test/test_mcslock.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_mcslock.c b/app/test/test_mcslock.c
index fbca78707d..80eaecc90a 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mcslock.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mcslock.c
@@ -37,10 +37,6 @@
  *   lock multiple times.
  */
 
-RTE_DEFINE_PER_LCORE(rte_mcslock_t, _ml_me);
-RTE_DEFINE_PER_LCORE(rte_mcslock_t, _ml_try_me);
-RTE_DEFINE_PER_LCORE(rte_mcslock_t, _ml_perf_me);
-
 rte_mcslock_t *p_ml;
 rte_mcslock_t *p_ml_try;
 rte_mcslock_t *p_ml_perf;
@@ -53,7 +49,7 @@ static int
 test_mcslock_per_core(__rte_unused void *arg)
 {
 	/* Per core me node. */
-	rte_mcslock_t ml_me = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ml_me);
+	rte_mcslock_t ml_me;
 
 	rte_mcslock_lock(&p_ml, &ml_me);
 	printf("MCS lock taken on core %u\n", rte_lcore_id());
@@ -77,7 +73,7 @@ load_loop_fn(void *func_param)
 	const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
 
 	/**< Per core me node. */
-	rte_mcslock_t ml_perf_me = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ml_perf_me);
+	rte_mcslock_t ml_perf_me;
 
 	/* wait synchro */
 	while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
@@ -151,8 +147,8 @@ static int
 test_mcslock_try(__rte_unused void *arg)
 {
 	/**< Per core me node. */
-	rte_mcslock_t ml_me     = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ml_me);
-	rte_mcslock_t ml_try_me = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ml_try_me);
+	rte_mcslock_t ml_me;
+	rte_mcslock_t ml_try_me;
 
 	/* Locked ml_try in the main lcore, so it should fail
 	 * when trying to lock it in the worker lcore.
@@ -178,8 +174,8 @@ test_mcslock(void)
 	int i;
 
 	/* Define per core me node. */
-	rte_mcslock_t ml_me     = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ml_me);
-	rte_mcslock_t ml_try_me = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ml_try_me);
+	rte_mcslock_t ml_me;
+	rte_mcslock_t ml_try_me;
 
 	/*
 	 * Test mcs lock & unlock on each core
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-04 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 17:04 Olivier Matz [this message]
2020-11-04 17:57 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-04 21:03   ` Olivier Matz
2020-11-04 21:20     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-01-15 15:28 ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201104170425.8882-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).