DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] mbuf: minor cleanup
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:36:11 +0100
Message-ID: <20201105133611.GU1898@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201026144201.54899-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:01PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the
> API documentation.
> Also, the RTE_ prefix was missing on a macro and a definition.
> Note: This patch does not touch the offload and attachment flags that are
> also missing the RTE_ prefix.
> Changes only affecting documentation:
> * Removed the MBUF_INVALID_PORT definition from rte_mbuf.h; it is
>   already defined in rte_mbuf_core.h.
>   This removal also reestablished the description of the
>   rte_pktmbuf_reset() function.
> * Corrected the comment related to RTE_MBUF_MAX_NB_SEGS.
> * Corrected the comment related to PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT.
> Changes regarding missing RTE_ prefix:
> * Converted the MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK() macro to an
>   __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() inline function.
>   Added backwards compatible macro with the original name.
> * Renamed the MBUF_INVALID_PORT definition to RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID.
>   Added backwards compatible definition with the original name.
> v2:
> * Use RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID instead of MBUF_INVALID_PORT in rte_mbuf.c.
> v3:
> * The functions/macros used in __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() require
>   RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT or RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG, or they don't use the mbuf
>   parameter, which generates a compiler waning. So mark the mbuf parameter
>   __rte_unused if none of them are defined.
> v4:
> * Removed compile time variants of __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(); keeping
>   the one variant where the mbuf parameter is marked __rte_unused.
> * Reflect in the __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() description headline that
>   it is for debug mode.
> * Improved the description of RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID.
> * Updated sfc driver to use __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() instead of
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>

Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-16  8:17 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] " Morten Brørup
2020-09-16  8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] " Morten Brørup
2020-09-16 10:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Morten Brørup
2020-10-26 14:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Morten Brørup
2020-11-05 13:36     ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2020-11-05 16:58       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201105133611.GU1898@platinum \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git