From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6480A0527;
	Mon,  9 Nov 2020 17:20:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CC86A1C;
	Mon,  9 Nov 2020 17:20:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com (mail-pf1-f194.google.com
 [209.85.210.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1966004
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  9 Nov 2020 17:20:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x13so8602781pfa.9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:20:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=YmeAhhG8CUZk0vg9mqQADlJlK8ArOJUDdIGP+oEjQ0w=;
 b=cOmYK+1ZoI+8wxkFkCytoT8Cijoz4fi3UeexTjjvaYwxm9fnqyq+BnZ5j5Y+FznvHL
 LdFZejyVyhPzrfEui8sivvC8Fng1GyYK+EES4fdFl/tX99dxB9Hxu5NK5zgJbp87jyX5
 IYnoX+BK4Y/rfBvVMThhZ3P5FgS31j2nno1vbKKxaCv1mlm9Hmu8qsE3s9lZ/qq6D0PR
 ry1OaqrPNMKba5d3O3D70XkT1P8TXfOL8TlUTszSOfgL9CCUAwMs8sRVu9s/6oXGV3eP
 bXbBuePhvjDG8Ts6l2dJDCXXSN1q9M7Zxf23+I2nETGYsT8hUXltpS35yicQN6l9ZRMF
 E44A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=YmeAhhG8CUZk0vg9mqQADlJlK8ArOJUDdIGP+oEjQ0w=;
 b=XI5jQaqjduSAwH/7OO6mMc2q9Er3704w6dxtcrCARgVLb7UsoDpVShnQEGdi5c2pCk
 F5b0R+N57lFICzQhjcR5FxhvHsl6PHljzSJ68tkByglK0AsQkNYvduolF8gdr+XfMJbS
 PQSl+OsKMIGlSapylveStFrdVYJIRSIS1cGFFge1c4casLB/WxpCEkvp5eXnXXG+urTz
 7fWf7OIiWiRKiwJOcAFos4w3zHhmpW9xpD4IWZ7F7iJTT9Y+1Fjdqhw/lG+xmsvo2JSc
 UlpgXuwLqNIQu1XLLFOL0Jjpgbv99ivW9JpWXGheLaW+NsIF+HUDDb2b39SH88UfiETx
 0TQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lmiRkzYZF7faNSwSkvP4QTnhrCPjAFKJHUgWBW6Vm9uXK0HfJ
 y6SqmvLKsx2V9QvRNoQYWbOT+RSiO5/D0GG/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxH63ImDokRGLbmIJMUYHD83er88dXeuBLGZ/AJpuWhf5Kb2tC9bvUJw5FZe57UYmWAdxMRHQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3d6:: with SMTP id go22mr84792pjb.53.1604938830041; 
 Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11sm10180895pgl.20.2020.11.09.08.20.29
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:20:21 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, Thomas Monjalon
 <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Luca Boccassi
 <bluca@debian.org>, Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
Message-ID: <20201109082021.4d09d9cc@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20201109161045.GK831@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20200922143202.8755-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20201105223602.5965-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20201105223602.5965-2-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20201109134931.GG831@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20201109075440.44130509@hermes.local>
 <CAJFAV8zKLwphemj+faU8vXNezAirP1wx=u3ebPBub9WKDk5WjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201109160548.GJ831@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <CAJFAV8ypJ6dayszBR3d8F0gXaox4V-8JtOGqY4Lz0S6DHKK_kg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201109161045.GK831@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/6] eal: replace usage of
 blacklist/whitelist in enum
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:10:45 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:07:16PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:06 PM Bruce Richardson
> > <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:03:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:  
> > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM Stephen Hemminger
> > > > <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:  
> > > > > > This patch causes build failures which persist until patch 3, because of
> > > > > > these deprecations. I think you need to define the backward-compatibility
> > > > > > macros here, but only mark them deprecated at the end of the set.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /Bruce  
> > > > >
> > > > > Is building without warnings in every step that important?
> > > > > The previous patch series for master/slave had the same effect  
> > > >
> > > > Thomas fixed it while applying.
> > > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/cover/80987/#122107
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > In this case I believe the below needs to be applied to patch 1, and then
> > > the inverse of it set as patch 4 to mark the compatibility macros as
> > > deprecated.  
> > 
> > Or just squash the patches and be done with it, like I already commented.
> > No one cares about this series anyway.
> >   
> Ok, yep, that's fine too.
> 
> /Bruce

Agree, go ahead and combine the patches.
They were split for testing and review.