From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, lihuisong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC V4] app/testpmd: fix queue stats mapping configuration
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:29:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120202928.126217ad@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9dca1ddf-1842-7087-7f04-98604536340e@intel.com>
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 23:33:40 +0000
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/20/2020 11:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:26:55 +0000
> > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/20/2020 11:50 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> >>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>
> >>> Currently, the queue stats mapping has the following problems:
> >>> 1) Many PMD drivers don't support queue stats mapping. But there is no
> >>> failure message after executing the command "set stat_qmap rx 0 2 2".
> >>> 2) Once queue mapping is set, unrelated and unmapped queues are also
> >>> displayed.
> >>> 3) The configuration result does not take effect or can not be queried
> >>> in real time.
> >>> 4) The mapping arrays, "tx_queue_stats_mappings_array" &
> >>> "rx_queue_stats_mappings_array" are global and their sizes are based on
> >>> fixed max port and queue size assumptions.
> >>> 5) These record structures, 'map_port_queue_stats_mapping_registers()'
> >>> and its sub functions are redundant for majority of drivers.
> >>> 6) The display of the queue stats and queue stats mapping is mixed
> >>> together.
> >>>
> >>> Since xstats is used to obtain queue statistics, we have made the following
> >>> simplifications and adjustments:
> >>> 1) If PMD requires and supports queue stats mapping, configure to driver in
> >>> real time by calling ethdev API after executing the command
> >>> "set stat_qmap rx/tx ...". If not, the command can not be accepted.
> >>> 2) Based on the above adjustments, these record structures,
> >>> 'map_port_queue_stats_mapping_registers()' and its sub functions can be
> >>> removed. "tx-queue-stats-mapping" & "rx-queue-stats-mapping" parameters,
> >>> and 'parse_queue_stats_mapping_config()' can be removed too.
> >>> 3) remove display of queue stats mapping in 'fwd_stats_display()' &
> >>> 'nic_stats_display()', and obtain queue stats by xstats.
> >>> Since the record structures are removed, 'nic_stats_mapping_display()'
> >>> can be deleted.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 4dccdc789bf4b ("app/testpmd: simplify handling of stats mappings error")
> >>> Fixes: 013af9b6b64f6 ("app/testpmd: various updates")
> >>> Fixes: ed30d9b691b21 ("app/testpmd: add stats per queue")
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Overall looks good to me.
> >> I did a quick test didn't see anything unexpected. 'xstats' or 'dpdk-proc-info'
> >> app still can be used to get queue stats and "set stat_qmap ..." is working as
> >> expected.
> >>
> >> But it is a little late for this release cycle, would you be OK to get this at
> >> the beginning of next release?
> >
> > Could we plan to deprecate queue stats mapping in future when xstats work is done?
> >
>
> Even queue stats moved to xstats, a few PMDs still need this configuration and API.
> And this patch already cleans the queue stats mapping noise from testpmd.
>
> What is the benefit/motivation to deprecate the queue stats mapping API?
Mostly because so few drivers implement it, that any application using it
is going to be non-portable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-21 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-20 8:26 [dpdk-dev] [RFC V2 0/2] fix queue stats mapping Min Hu (Connor)
2020-10-20 8:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V2 1/2] app/testpmd: fix queue stats mapping configuration Min Hu (Connor)
2020-10-30 20:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-03 6:30 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2020-11-12 2:28 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2020-11-12 9:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-18 3:39 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2020-11-20 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V4] " Min Hu (Connor)
2020-11-20 17:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-20 23:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-20 23:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-21 4:29 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-11-23 7:22 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2020-11-23 9:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-30 8:29 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2020-12-02 10:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-12-02 12:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V1] " Min Hu (Connor)
2020-12-08 15:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-12-07 1:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V4] " Min Hu (Connor)
2020-10-20 8:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V2 2/2] app/testpmd: fix starting failed with queue-stats-mapping Min Hu (Connor)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201120202928.126217ad@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).