DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
	Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] app/eventdev: fix SMP barrier bugs for perf test
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:07:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201222050728.41000-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201222050728.41000-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>

This patch fixes RTE SMP barrier bugs for the perf test of eventdev.

For the "perf_process_last_stage" function, wmb after storing
processed_pkts should be moved before it. This is because the worker
lcore should ensure it has really finished data processing, e.g. event
stored into buffers, before the shared variables "w->processed_pkts"are
stored.

For the "perf_process_last_stage_latency", on the one hand, the wmb
should be moved before storing into "w->processed_pkts". The reason is
the same as above. But on the other hand, for "w->latency", wmb is
unnecessary due to data dependency.

Fixes: 2369f73329f8 ("app/testeventdev: add perf queue worker functions")
Cc: jerinj@marvell.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 app/test-eventdev/test_perf_common.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_perf_common.h b/app/test-eventdev/test_perf_common.h
index ff9705df8..e7233e5a5 100644
--- a/app/test-eventdev/test_perf_common.h
+++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_perf_common.h
@@ -97,8 +97,13 @@ perf_process_last_stage(struct rte_mempool *const pool,
 		void *bufs[], int const buf_sz, uint8_t count)
 {
 	bufs[count++] = ev->event_ptr;
-	w->processed_pkts++;
+
+	/* wmb here ensures event_prt is stored before
+	 * updating the number of processed packets
+	 * for worker lcores
+	 */
 	rte_smp_wmb();
+	w->processed_pkts++;
 
 	if (unlikely(count == buf_sz)) {
 		count = 0;
@@ -116,6 +121,12 @@ perf_process_last_stage_latency(struct rte_mempool *const pool,
 	struct perf_elt *const m = ev->event_ptr;
 
 	bufs[count++] = ev->event_ptr;
+
+	/* wmb here ensures event_prt is stored before
+	 * updating the number of processed packets
+	 * for worker lcores
+	 */
+	rte_smp_wmb();
 	w->processed_pkts++;
 
 	if (unlikely(count == buf_sz)) {
@@ -127,7 +138,6 @@ perf_process_last_stage_latency(struct rte_mempool *const pool,
 	}
 
 	w->latency += latency;
-	rte_smp_wmb();
 	return count;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-22  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22  5:07 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] refactor smp barriers in app/eventdev Feifei Wang
2020-12-22  5:07 ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2020-12-22  5:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] app/eventdev: remove unnecessary barriers for perf test Feifei Wang
2020-12-22  5:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] app/eventdev: replace wmb with thread fence " Feifei Wang
2020-12-22  5:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 4/6] app/eventdev: add release barriers for pipeline test Feifei Wang
2020-12-22  5:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 5/6] app/eventdev: remove unnecessary " Feifei Wang
2020-12-22  5:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 6/6] app/eventdev: remove unnecessary barriers for order test Feifei Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-22  3:22 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] refactor smp barriers in app/eventdev Feifei Wang
2020-12-22  3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] app/eventdev: fix SMP barrier bugs for perf test Feifei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201222050728.41000-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).