* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
@ 2021-02-11 12:04 John McNamara
2021-02-11 12:08 ` Mcnamara, John
2021-02-14 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John McNamara @ 2021-02-11 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: thomas, John McNamara
Fix grammar, spelling and formatting of DPDK 21.02 release notes.
Signed-off-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_02.rst | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_02.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_02.rst
index 84b04a018..167eefb36 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_02.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_02.rst
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ New Features
Added support for matching and raw encap/decap of GENEVE TLV option.
-* **Added support of modify field action in the flow API.**
+* **Added support for Modify field action in the flow API.**
- Added modify action support to perform various operations on
+ Added "modify" action support to rte_flow to perform various operations on
any arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag values):
``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MODIFY_FIELD``.
Supported operations are: overwriting a field with the content from
@@ -90,22 +90,22 @@ New Features
* **Updated Cisco enic driver.**
- * Added support for 64B completion queue entries
+ * Added support for 64B completion queue entries.
* **Updated Hisilicon hns3 driver.**
- * Added support for traffic management
+ * Added support for traffic management.
* **Updated Intel i40e driver.**
- * Added support on Windows.
+ * Added Intel i40e support on Windows.
* **Updated Intel ice driver.**
Updated the Intel ice driver with new features and improvements, including:
* Added Double VLAN support for DCF switch QinQ filtering.
- * Added support for UDP dynamic port assignment for eCPRI tunnel in DCF.
+ * Added support for UDP dynamic port assignment for eCPRI tunnels in DCF.
* **Updated Intel iavf driver.**
@@ -120,9 +120,9 @@ New Features
* Introduced basic support on Windows.
* Added GTP PDU session container matching and raw encap/decap.
- * Added support for RSS action in the sample sub-actions list.
+ * Added support for a RSS action in the sample sub-actions list.
* Added support for E-Switch mirroring and jump action in the same flow.
- * Added support to handle modify action in correct order regarding the
+ * Added support to handle the modify action in correct order regarding the
mirroring action on E-Switch.
* Enlarged the number of flow priorities to 21844 (0 - 21843) for ingress or
egress flow groups greater than 0 and for any transfer flow group.
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ New Features
* Added inner UDP/IPv4 support for VXLAN IPv4 GSO.
-* **Added enqueue & dequeue callback APIs for cryptodev library.**
+* **Added enqueue and dequeue callback APIs for cryptodev library.**
- Cryptodev library is added with enqueue & dequeue callback APIs to
- enable applications to add/remove user callbacks which gets called
+ The Cryptodev library has been enhanced with enqueue and dequeue callback APIs to
+ enable applications to add/remove user callbacks which get called
for every enqueue/dequeue operation.
* **Updated the OCTEON TX2 crypto PMD.**
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ New Features
* **Added python script to run crypto perf tests and graph the results.**
- A new python script has been added to automate running crypto performance
+ A new Python script has been added to automate running crypto performance
tests and output graphed results to PDF files.
See the :doc:`../tools/cryptoperf` guide for more details.
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-11 12:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02 John McNamara
@ 2021-02-11 12:08 ` Mcnamara, John
2021-02-11 23:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-14 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mcnamara, John @ 2021-02-11 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas; +Cc: dev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:04 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
>
> Fix grammar, spelling and formatting of DPDK 21.02 release notes.
Thomas,
I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else adds something to it. If not you can remove it.
Also, there probably should be a note about the change to pmdinfogen in this release. I didn't know enough about it to add it myself.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-11 12:08 ` Mcnamara, John
@ 2021-02-11 23:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-12 8:14 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-02-12 11:57 ` Bruce Richardson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-02-11 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mcnamara, John; +Cc: dev, dmitry.kozliuk
11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John:
> Thomas,
>
> I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else
> adds something to it. If not you can remove it.
OK, I will remove.
> Also, there probably should be a note about the change to pmdinfogen
> in this release. I didn't know enough about it to add it myself.
Yes it is a rewrite of a build tool.
The real new feature is the support of Windows for pmdinfo.
+Cc Dmitry for helping with the wording.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-11 23:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-02-12 8:14 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-02-12 11:57 ` Bruce Richardson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk @ 2021-02-12 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mcnamara, John; +Cc: Thomas Monjalon, dev
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:33:35 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John:
> > Also, there probably should be a note about the change to pmdinfogen
> > in this release. I didn't know enough about it to add it myself.
>
> Yes it is a rewrite of a build tool.
> The real new feature is the support of Windows for pmdinfo.
>
> +Cc Dmitry for helping with the wording.
* **Added Windows support to pmdinfogen.**
PMD information strings are added for Windows as well as for other OS.
Extracting them from Windows DLLs is not yet supported. A build-time tool
pmdinfogen is rewritten in Python, thus native compiler and libelf are not
required for build machine anymore, but pyelftools build-time dependency is
added.
Feel free to use and/or adjust.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-11 23:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-12 8:14 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
@ 2021-02-12 11:57 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-02-12 12:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2021-02-12 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, dmitry.kozliuk
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:33:35AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John:
>
> > Thomas,
> >
> > I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else
> > adds something to it. If not you can remove it.
>
> OK, I will remove.
>
Should the new dependency on pyelftools be called out here? Since it's not
a common package I think it needs to be emphasised as a new dependency and
instructions on how to get it.
> > Also, there probably should be a note about the change to pmdinfogen
> > in this release. I didn't know enough about it to add it myself.
>
> Yes it is a rewrite of a build tool.
> The real new feature is the support of Windows for pmdinfo.
>
> +Cc Dmitry for helping with the wording.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-12 11:57 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2021-02-12 12:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-12 13:30 ` Bruce Richardson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-02-12 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, dmitry.kozliuk
12/02/2021 12:57, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:33:35AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John:
> >
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else
> > > adds something to it. If not you can remove it.
> >
> > OK, I will remove.
>
> Should the new dependency on pyelftools be called out here? Since it's not
> a common package I think it needs to be emphasised as a new dependency and
> instructions on how to get it.
What do you think of this update?
https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/87883/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-12 12:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-02-12 13:30 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-02-12 13:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2021-02-12 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, dmitry.kozliuk
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:49:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 12/02/2021 12:57, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:33:35AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John:
> > >
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else
> > > > adds something to it. If not you can remove it.
> > >
> > > OK, I will remove.
> >
> > Should the new dependency on pyelftools be called out here? Since it's
> > not a common package I think it needs to be emphasised as a new
> > dependency and instructions on how to get it.
>
> What do you think of this update? https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/87883/
>
I think that is ok as an update for that particular section of "new
features", but the fact is that that new feature introduces a new
dependency for everyone, which means it may be missed for those who aren't
interested in new features. Therefore, I think it should be called out
somewhere else too, to really call attention to it. The reason I would
suggest "known issues" is that it is a section that everyone looking at the
release notes is likely to pay attention to. However, other options, such
as a callout note at the top of the Release Notes i.e not in any particular
section, might work as well.
/Bruce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-12 13:30 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2021-02-12 13:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-02-12 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, dmitry.kozliuk
12/02/2021 14:30, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:49:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 12/02/2021 12:57, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:33:35AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John:
> > > >
> > > > > Thomas,
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else
> > > > > adds something to it. If not you can remove it.
> > > >
> > > > OK, I will remove.
> > >
> > > Should the new dependency on pyelftools be called out here? Since it's
> > > not a common package I think it needs to be emphasised as a new
> > > dependency and instructions on how to get it.
> >
> > What do you think of this update? https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/87883/
> >
> I think that is ok as an update for that particular section of "new
> features", but the fact is that that new feature introduces a new
> dependency for everyone, which means it may be missed for those who aren't
> interested in new features. Therefore, I think it should be called out
> somewhere else too, to really call attention to it. The reason I would
> suggest "known issues" is that it is a section that everyone looking at the
> release notes is likely to pay attention to. However, other options, such
> as a callout note at the top of the Release Notes i.e not in any particular
> section, might work as well.
I agree about the need,
but I don't think adding something in known issues is visible enough.
I will send a v2 with a note at the very beginning of the release notes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02
2021-02-11 12:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02 John McNamara
2021-02-11 12:08 ` Mcnamara, John
@ 2021-02-14 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-02-14 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John McNamara; +Cc: dev
11/02/2021 13:04, John McNamara:
> Fix grammar, spelling and formatting of DPDK 21.02 release notes.
>
> Signed-off-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Removed empty "known issues" and applied, thanks.
The other comments about pyelftools were addressed in separate patches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-14 9:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-11 12:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02 John McNamara
2021-02-11 12:08 ` Mcnamara, John
2021-02-11 23:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-12 8:14 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-02-12 11:57 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-02-12 12:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-12 13:30 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-02-12 13:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-14 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).