From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BC8A0565; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 02:28:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6801CC585; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 02:28:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f50.google.com (mail-pj1-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5704069E for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 02:28:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f50.google.com with SMTP id e9so5581624pjs.2 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:28:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HtuRumN0CxaabXUC0hD0gNuMop1XTGjmbQvKm0+yqgs=; b=EvsMGEp6LbugI5ZUhs2XeMuF2SEeNx5kBdN+RTaAfZQgQqThntmK6Q14vZpvvaoG3w uZCrVDfZPq0P9MgHkyKOwHNtpyz6MICTi30t+73aXRRmn9cKQKCgNaM8y3YV54Gofxty 0AayoWBqJTSShFfujws/xp6VT0cX22UUY45hviVGxvxeBT1pB/wk1Z9tKaYg6YNDuBWc bjN5vtA0v4dk0TdItj66bC/h407V8OPTxzAxjtye1ICXKd2ASdvPt7GakubokBD56uQR pfrBEsHW+Gv9vWnm0eqxA5bsqn409Nl2TgcEY2jAY9B00cbgR2I2g5DRcosyv564N8RE 4y7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HtuRumN0CxaabXUC0hD0gNuMop1XTGjmbQvKm0+yqgs=; b=J7Qrv/pRern6AmjHt0h8sDKtSRI8vyiLN2YKjCwSuKjUMOSHwE6RaoIsnowddHuFkX 1Uvo1ka2IfhpNoiML3qEEkd+3Tnhd7Dp3Bc1T8xrQvkmcFSQmBGtRlrgnCVB86Rugs+A 0GZ1wmVEUXIhU7pgeqK8mQkzaMiXUqjfc0hgHlziCECm1aYTIrfAFUeM8nLS9M00A3IG 1v4ooKP3wEeWmMgRw+v15PZab5mFSh6i4Lh7Ar4WhBR7XD2jtESzxCSDsDl6bDwokzcq 8TzW7Fqx437UcMp5XCwgIxdKoK4oS/PbXTinOiB6SGjBMY1+v8avp4T7vrWgOTsXCudL u31g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+MMPkeaOwqvoiF61cbIt3QvMPjchuk0vZJqMz7MabWsTt3Gf9 siCk8PA8wyK1Bgyd1eGDm75SgA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3d8OhWIhhHPxWG+xZEq+HZh5AQm88Jh+LIBBIUY8qY9iQvcb+51kNbJycxz3OL81vF4o09g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2301:b029:e4:700b:6d91 with SMTP id d1-20020a1709032301b02900e4700b6d91mr9137339plh.19.1614475704061; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (76-14-218-44.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.218.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mp1sm3049284pjb.48.2021.02.27.17.28.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:28:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:28:15 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Cristian Dumitrescu , Jasvinder Singh Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20210227172815.15236548@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK RED questions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Does the DPDK implementation of RED have the two bugs that VJ mentioned in the unpublished paper: "RED in a Different Light" https://gettys.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/red-in-a-different-light/ http://mirrors.bufferbloat.net/RelevantPapers/Red_in_a_different_light.pdf