From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B8DA0A02; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:58:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453AA4067B; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:58:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E5B4014F for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:58:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id 4170420B5680; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 4170420B5680 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1616623131; bh=QFmbiisUTUbD1f68ajz4WJ/Ibi9zf+WnEQjJ+fyKubA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PgsBrutb6zDH78dinT0kF+TJstvez8ZhSY7VDDZ0etkA0h3aiKrln/n/O1o3e1dTe I0Zz8EkrHJw2dnrsqy0FVj1UDeT9YhgDOH8GZD6cecOCmS3/ZVMnkCE7sSVZu9lI96 qID+vr86N9lfhMafdk7foCkNlxgC1Qpne2s+0aQo= Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:58:51 -0700 From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com Message-ID: <20210324215851.GB2272@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <1616560011-31647-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> <6578330.zVv2phWGOd@thomas> <20210324172841.GC14991@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> <11634428.8dEGKDZn2b@thomas> <20210324125228.5dca333a@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210324125228.5dca333a@hermes.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: standard c++ forbids defining the keyword asm as a macro X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:52:28PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:52:40 +0100 > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > There should be some test for C++ application use of API. > There doesn't appear to be one in the current CI suite. agreed, would probably catch a few things. probably a handful of the example applications could just have the file extension changed to .cpp and #include any random stl header would be a start (assuming meson just generates g++ vs gcc rules based on extension)