From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B8DA0A02;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:58:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453AA4067B;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:58:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E5B4014F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:58:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086)
 id 4170420B5680; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 4170420B5680
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com;
 s=default; t=1616623131;
 bh=QFmbiisUTUbD1f68ajz4WJ/Ibi9zf+WnEQjJ+fyKubA=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=PgsBrutb6zDH78dinT0kF+TJstvez8ZhSY7VDDZ0etkA0h3aiKrln/n/O1o3e1dTe
 I0Zz8EkrHJw2dnrsqy0FVj1UDeT9YhgDOH8GZD6cecOCmS3/ZVMnkCE7sSVZu9lI96
 qID+vr86N9lfhMafdk7foCkNlxgC1Qpne2s+0aQo=
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:58:51 -0700
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org,
 david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
 drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Message-ID: <20210324215851.GB2272@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <1616560011-31647-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <6578330.zVv2phWGOd@thomas>
 <20210324172841.GC14991@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <11634428.8dEGKDZn2b@thomas> <20210324125228.5dca333a@hermes.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210324125228.5dca333a@hermes.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: standard c++ forbids defining the
 keyword asm as a macro
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:52:28PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:52:40 +0100
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 
> There should be some test for C++ application use of API.
> There doesn't appear to be one in the current CI suite.

agreed, would probably catch a few things. probably a handful of the
example applications could just have the file extension changed to .cpp
and #include any random stl header would be a start (assuming meson just
generates g++ vs gcc rules based on extension)