DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, fbl@sysclose.org,
	i.maximets@ovn.org, Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/tap: do not touch Tx offload flags
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:53:52 +0200
Message-ID: <20210408075352.GR1650@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401095243.18211-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Tx offload flags are of the application responsibility.
> Leave the mbuf alone and check for TSO where needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

Maybe the problem being solved should be better described in the commit
log. Is it a problem (other than cosmetic) to touch a mbuf in the Tx
function of a driver, where we could expect that the mbuf is owned by
the driver?

The only problem I can think about is in case we transmit a direct mbuf
whose refcnt is increased, but I wonder how much this is really
supported: for instance, several drivers add vlans using
rte_vlan_insert() in their Tx path.


> ---
>  drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index c36d4bf76e..285fe395c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ tap_tx_l3_cksum(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
>  		uint16_t *l4_phdr_cksum, uint32_t *l4_raw_cksum)
>  {
>  	void *l3_hdr = packet + l2_len;
> +	uint64_t csum_l4;
>  
>  	if (ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_IPV4)) {
>  		struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph = l3_hdr;
> @@ -571,13 +572,17 @@ tap_tx_l3_cksum(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
>  		cksum = rte_raw_cksum(iph, l3_len);
>  		iph->hdr_checksum = (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : ~cksum;
>  	}
> -	if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) {
> +
> +	csum_l4 = ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK;
> +	if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)
> +		csum_l4 |= PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> +	if (csum_l4) {
>  		void *l4_hdr;
>  
>  		l4_hdr = packet + l2_len + l3_len;
> -		if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> +		if (csum_l4 == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
>  			*l4_cksum = &((struct rte_udp_hdr *)l4_hdr)->dgram_cksum;
> -		else if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> +		else if (csum_l4 == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
>  			*l4_cksum = &((struct rte_tcp_hdr *)l4_hdr)->cksum;
>  		else
>  			return;
> @@ -648,7 +653,8 @@ tap_write_mbufs(struct tx_queue *txq, uint16_t num_mbufs,
>  		if (txq->csum &&
>  		    ((mbuf->ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_IPV4) ||
>  		     (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM ||
> -		     (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM))) {
> +		     (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM) ||
> +		     (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG))) {
>  			is_cksum = 1;
>  
>  			/* Support only packets with at least layer 4
> @@ -742,9 +748,6 @@ pmd_tx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>  		if (tso) {
>  			struct rte_gso_ctx *gso_ctx = &txq->gso_ctx;
>  
> -			/* TCP segmentation implies TCP checksum offload */
> -			mbuf_in->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> -
>  			/* gso size is calculated without RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN */
>  			hdrs_len = mbuf_in->l2_len + mbuf_in->l3_len +
>  					mbuf_in->l4_len;
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01  9:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Offload flags fixes David Marchand
2021-04-01  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated David Marchand
2021-04-07 20:14   ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-08  7:23   ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08  8:41     ` David Marchand
2021-04-01  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/tap: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-04-07 20:15   ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-08  7:41     ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 11:21       ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-08 12:05         ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 12:58           ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-09 13:30             ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-09 16:55               ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-28 12:17               ` David Marchand
2021-04-08 12:16         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-08  7:53   ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-04-28 12:12     ` David Marchand
2021-04-01  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/virtio: " David Marchand
2021-04-13 14:17   ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-01  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-04-08 13:05   ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-09  2:31   ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-01  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-04-08  8:28   ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 18:38   ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-13 15:27     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-27 17:09       ` David Marchand
2021-04-27 17:19         ` David Marchand
2021-04-29  8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Offload flags fixes David Marchand
2021-04-29  8:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated David Marchand
2021-04-29 12:14     ` Lance Richardson
2021-04-29 16:45     ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-29  8:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-04-29 13:51     ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-29  8:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-04-29 12:59     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29  8:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-04-29 13:30     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 13:31       ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 20:21         ` David Marchand
2021-04-30  8:38           ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 20:09       ` David Marchand
2021-04-29 18:39     ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-29 19:18       ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Offload flags fixes David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated David Marchand
2021-05-03 14:02     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-05-03 14:12     ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-05-03 15:24   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Offload flags fixes Maxime Coquelin
2021-05-03 16:21     ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] " David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-05-04 11:07     ` Flavio Leitner
2021-05-08  6:24     ` Wang, Yinan
2021-05-12  3:29       ` Wang, Yinan
2021-05-12 15:20         ` David Marchand
2021-05-13  6:34           ` Wang, Yinan
2021-05-04  8:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Offload flags fixes Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210408075352.GR1650@platinum \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fbl@sysclose.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git