From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: standard c++ forbids defining the keyword asm as a macro
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:16:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210417011605.GA13677@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3365684.9AJlD7vKmA@thomas>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:35:53PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/03/2021 05:26, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_common.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_common.h
> > @@ -31,9 +31,11 @@ extern "C" {
> > #define typeof __typeof__
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifndef __cplusplus
> > #ifndef asm
> > #define asm __asm__
> > #endif
> > +#endif
>
> Applied with this explanation:
>
> eal: do not redefine asm keyword in C++
>
> C++ forbids redefining a keyword as a macro.
> The keyword asm is conditionally-supported and implementation defined,
> but it seems our best guess.
>
> In C, if asm does not exist, it is defined as __asm__
> which is a GNU extension.
>
>
> One more question:
> Can we have a similar issue with typeof?
> I guess it works because typeof is not a keyword?
typeof isn't a keyword though don't fully understand the benefit of
#define typeof __typeof__ since it just pollutes the application
namespace. extensions and intrinsics generally should stay in the
namespace reserved for use by the compiler `__'.
i would say we will have a similar issue with any keyword defined in the
c++ standard if we are defining any of them.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-17 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 4:26 Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 8:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 16:45 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 17:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 17:28 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 17:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 19:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-24 21:58 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 21:55 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 22:41 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-03-25 0:09 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-25 8:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 18:50 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-04-13 13:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13 13:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-17 1:16 ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210417011605.GA13677@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).